BJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ng, C S
Right arrow Articles by Arends, M J
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ng, C S
Right arrow Articles by Arends, M J
British Journal of Radiology 75 (2002),31-37 © 2002 The British Institute of Radiology

Full paper

Histopathological correlates of abnormal pericolic fat on CT in the assessment of colorectal carcinoma

C S Ng, MRCP, FRCR1, T C Doyle, FRACR,1, A K Dixon, FRCP, FRCR1, R Miller, MS, FRCS2 and M J Arends, MD, FRCPath3

Departments of 1Radiology, 2Surgery and 3Pathology, Addenbrooke's NHS Trust and the University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK

Correspondence: C S Ng, Department of Radiology, Division of Diagnostic Imaging, Box 57, MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, Texas 77030-4095, USA

The aim of this study was to assess the pathological significance of abnormal pericolic fat shown by CT in the context of colorectal carcinoma. CT and histopathological findings of 63 resected colorectal carcinomas were retrospectively reviewed. CT examinations were assessed by two observers for the presence or absence of abnormal pericolic fat (typically linear or nodular opacities) at tumour sites. Specimens were reviewed histopathologically for depth of tumour invasion, extramuscular tissue reaction, and number and largest size of tumour-involved and tumour-free lymph nodes. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of pericolic fat in identifying extension of tumour infiltration beyond the muscle coat were 79% (42/53), 33% (2/6), 91% (42/46) and 15% (2/13), respectively. Despite these indicators of efficacy, the association between the presence of pericolic fat abnormality on CT and extramuscular extension of tumour (infiltration and/or nodal disease) or tissue reaction alone or in combination did not reach statistical significance (p>0.3 in all cases). Abnormal ("misty" or "mucky") pericolic fat in the assessment of colorectal cancer on CT is not a precise indicator of extramuscular extension of tumour, as it cannot clearly distinguish between tumour infiltration and tissue reaction beyond the muscle coat, or pericolic nodal involvement. However, it is a very helpful CT sign that may draw attention to the presence and site of a potential colonic abnormality.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Br Med BullHome page
T H Saunders, H K Mendes Ribeiro, and F V Gleeson
New techniques for imaging colorectal cancer: the use of MRI, PET and radioimmunoscintigraphy for primary staging and follow-up
Br. Med. Bull., December 1, 2002; 64(1): 81 - 99.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING  ALL BIR JOURNALS 
Copyright © 2002 by the British Institute of Radiology.