BJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH

Published online before print July 20, 2009
British Journal of Radiology 2009, doi:10.1259/bjr/74949757
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Rapid PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by PAUDYAL, B
Right arrow Articles by ENDO, K
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by PAUDYAL, B
Right arrow Articles by ENDO, K
© 2009 The British Institute of Radiology

Full paper

The role of the ADC value in the characterisation of renal carcinoma by diffusion-weighted MRI

B PAUDYAL 1, P PAUDYAL 1, Y TSUSHIMA 1, N ORIUCHI 1, M AMANUMA 1, M MIYAZAKI 1, A TAKETOMI-TAKAHASHI 1, Y NAKAZATO 2, K ENDO 1

1 Department of Diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, Showa-machi 3-39-22, Maebashi, Gunma 371-8510, Japan
2 Department of Human Pathology, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, Showa-machi 3-39-22, Maebashi, Gunma 371-8510, Japan


   Abstract

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the role of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in combination with T1 and T2 weighted MRI for the characterisation of renal carcinoma. The institutional review board approved the study protocols and waived informed consent from all of the patients. 47 patients (32 male and 15 female; age range, 21–85 years; median age, 65 years) who had suspected renal lesions on abdominal CT underwent MRI for further evaluation and characterisation of the lesions from April 2005 to August 2007 in our university hospital. A region of interest was drawn around the tumour area on apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps. Final diagnosis was confirmed by histological examination of surgical specimens from all patients. The ADC value was significantly higher in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) than in transitional cell carcinoma (2.71 ± 2.35 x 10-3 mm2•s-1 vs 1.61 ± 0.80 x 10-3 mm2•s-1; p = 0.022). While analysing the histological subtypes of RCC, a significant difference in ADC values between clear cell carcinoma and non-clear cell carcinoma was found (1.59 ± 0.55 x 10-3 mm2•s-1 vs 6.72 ± 1.85 x 10-3 mm2•s-1; p = 0.0004). Similarly, ADC values of RCC showed a significant difference between positive and negative metastatic lesions (1.06 ± 0.38 x 10-3 mm2•s-1 vs 3.02 ± 2.44 x 10-3 mm2•s-1; p = 0.0004), whereas intensity on T1 and T2 weighted imaging did not reach statistical significance. In conclusion, DWI has clinical value in the characterisation of renal carcinomas and could be applied in clinical practice for their management.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
BJR DMFR IMAGING  ALL BIR JOURNALS 
Copyright © 2009 by the British Institute of Radiology.