| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Full paper |
1Physics Department, The Royal Marsden NHS Trust, Fulham Road, London SW3 6JJ, UK and 2Departamento de Radiología, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid 28040, Spain
An experimental and theoretical study has been made of the variations in air kermalength product (AKLP) at the surface of a phantom exposed in a CT scanner, using clinical parameters. For the theoretical part, a computer simulation was developed, based on a simple analytical model, requiring information generic to the scanner model. The effects of patient size, position within the gantry plane and beam-shaping filter type were studied using three different elliptical phantoms. A dose reduction technique based on a sinusoidal tube current modulation system was also investigated. The surface AKLP was shown to be independent of phantom size (within experimental error) but decreases as the surface moves vertically away from the isocentre. The major contributor to this variation is the beam-shaping filter. A maximum difference of 19% between the values of surface AKLP was calculated for the two beam-shaping filters available. When the tube current modulation system was used, the maximum surface dose reduction was 18%. A maximum difference of 2% was found between measurements and computer simulations. It is therefore possible to predict the behaviour of AKLP using the analytical model. As the dose measured on the surface of a patient is simply related to AKLP, the model can be applied to data obtained from patient surface dose surveys and can be helpful in interpreting the sources of variation in the latter.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
I. A. Tsalafoutas, V. Tsapaki, C. Triantopoulou, C. Pouli, V. Kouridou, I. Fagadaki, and J. Papailiou Comparison of Measured and Calculated Skin Doses in CT-Guided Interventional Procedures Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2008; 191(5): 1601 - 1607. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Li, U. K. Udayasankar, T. L. Toth, J. Seamans, W. C. Small, and M. K. Kalra Automatic Patient Centering for MDCT: Effect on Radiation Dose Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2007; 188(2): 547 - 552. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Aviles Lucas, D. R. Dance, I. A. Castellano, and E. Vano Estimation of the peak entrance surface air kerma for patients undergoing computed tomography-guided procedures Radiat Prot Dosimetry, May 17, 2005; 114(1-3): 317 - 320. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. K. Kalra, C. Wittram, M. M. Maher, A. Sharma, G. B. Avinash, K. Karau, T. L. Toth, E. Halpern, S. Saini, and J.-A. Shepard Can Noise Reduction Filters Improve Low-Radiation-Dose Chest CT Images? Pilot Study Radiology, July 1, 2003; 228(1): 257 - 264. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| BJR | DMFR | IMAGING | ALL BIR JOURNALS |