BJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wang, Y-X J
Right arrow Articles by Morcos, S K
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wang, Y-X J
Right arrow Articles by Morcos, S K
British Journal of Radiology 74 (2001),1103-1108 © 2001 The British Institute of Radiology

Full paper

Radiographic contrast media induced nephropathy: experimental observations and the protective effect of calcium channel blockers

Y-X J Wang, MD1, Y-F Jia, MSc2, K-M Chen, MD1 and S K Morcos, FRCS, FFRRCSI, FRCR3

1Department of Radiology, Rui Jin Hospital, Shanghai Second Medical University, Shanghai, China, 2College of Pharmacy, Shanghai Medical University, Shanghai, China and 3Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Northern General Hospital, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Sheffield S5 7AU, UK

Correspondence: Dr S K Morcos

Combined acute inhibition of the synthesis of nitric oxide with L-nitroarginine methyl ester (L-NAME) and of prostacycline synthesis with indomethacin predisposes rats to severe renal injury from radiographic contrast media. The reliability of this pharmacological manipulation in the study of radiographic contrast medium induced nephropathy (RCMN) was investigated. Adult male Sprague–Dawley rats were injected with iv L-NAME (10 mg kg-1) and iv indomethacin (10 mg kg-1) 15 min apart and prior to injection of RCM or normal saline (control group). A dose-dependent reduction in renal function was observed after intravascular injection of the high osmolar RCM diatrizoate (Angiografin, 306 mgI ml-1). A significant (p<0.01) increase in serum creatinine (Cr) (from 54.66±8.39 µmol l-1 to 171.96±24.49 µmol l-1 and from 80.95±6.73 µmol l-1 to 204.76±16.73 µmol -1, n=5 per group) was observed 24 h after injection of 6 ml and 8 ml of diatrizoate, respectively. The increase in serum Cr after injection of 8 ml of diatrizoate recovered spontaneously to 80.87±8.70 µmol l-1 7 days after injection. No significant change in renal function was observed in the control group (n=5) receiving 8 ml kg-1 of normal saline or after injection of 4 ml of diatrizoate (serum Cr 69.84±5.5 µmol l-1 pre contrast injection and 66.67±13.47 µmol l-1 24 h post contrast injection, n=5). The increase in serum Cr observed with 6 ml of diatrizoate was significantly higher (p<0.01) than the rise induced by equivolume of the low osmolar non-ionic monomer iopromide (Ultravist, 300 mgI ml-1) (serum CR 68.47±8.39 µmol l-1 pre contrast injection and 143.59±32.03 µmol l-1 24 h post contrast injection, n=5). The calcium channel blocker diltiazem (10 mg kg-1 injected intraperitoneally 30 min prior to RCM injection) prevented the rise in serum Cr observed with 6 ml of diatrizoate (serum Cr pre contrast injection 70.31±7.28 µmol-1 and 78.21±17.81 µmol-1 24 h post contrast injection in animals pre-treated with diltiazem, n=5). The protective effect against RCM-induced reduction in renal function was less with lower doses of diltiazem. In conclusion, the animal model used is reliable and reproduced previously established observations in the field of RCMN. The protective effect of a calcium channel blocker at the appropriate dose against RCMN has also been shown. The clinical effectiveness of this class of drugs in preventing RCMN requires further evaluation.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
F. Ferrario, M. T. Barone, G. Landoni, A. Genderini, M. Heidemperger, M. Trezzi, E. Piccaluga, P. Danna, and D. Scorza
Acetylcysteine and non-ionic isosmolar contrast-induced nephropathy--a randomized controlled study
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., June 23, 2009; (2009) gfp306v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Lab AnimHome page
Y.-X. J Wang and S.-X. Yan
Biomedical imaging in the safety evaluation of new drugs
Lab Anim, October 1, 2008; 42(4): 433 - 441.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
O. Toprak, M. Cirit, M. Tanrisev, C. Yazici, O. Canoz, M. Sipahioglu, A. Uzum, R. Ersoy, and E. Y. Sozmen
Preventive effect of nebivolol on contrast-induced nephropathy in rats
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., March 1, 2008; 23(3): 853 - 859.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Pathol.Home page
T. Yano, Y. Itoh, T. Kubota, T. Sendo, T. Koyama, T. Fujita, K. Saeki, A. Yuo, and R. Oishi
A Prostacyclin Analog Prevents Radiocontrast Nephropathy via Phosphorylation of Cyclic AMP Response Element Binding Protein
Am. J. Pathol., May 1, 2005; 166(5): 1333 - 1342.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
T. G. Gleeson and S. Bulugahapitiya
Contrast-Induced Nephropathy
Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2004; 183(6): 1673 - 1689.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Clin PharmacolHome page
C. D. Cox and J. P. Tsikouris
Preventing Contrast Nephropathy: What Is the Best Strategy? A Review of the Literature
J. Clin. Pharmacol., April 1, 2004; 44(4): 327 - 337.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
P. Aspelin, P. Aubry, S.-G. Fransson, R. Strasser, R. Willenbrock, K. J. Berg, and the NEPHRIC Study Investigators
Nephrotoxic Effects in High-Risk Patients Undergoing Angiography
N. Engl. J. Med., February 6, 2003; 348(6): 491 - 499.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
R. Tello, W. Huber, W. Weiss, and K. Ilgmann
Intrarenal Kinetics: Effect of Adenosine and Theophylline * Dr Huber and colleagues respond:
Radiology, February 1, 2003; 226(2): 596 - 597.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING  ALL BIR JOURNALS 
Copyright © 2001 by the British Institute of Radiology.