This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Cook, J V Articles by Pablot, S M Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Cook, J V Articles by Pablot, S M

Key factors in the optimization of paediatric X-ray practice

¹Queen Mary's Hospital for Children, The St Helier NHS Trust, Wrythe Lane, Surrey SM5 1AA and ²The Radiological Protection Centre, St George's Hospital, Blackshaw Road, London SW17 0QT, UK

Correspondence: J C Kyriou

Justification of radiological requests, standardization of procedures and optimization of protection measures are key principles in the protection of individuals exposed to ionizing radiation for diagnostic purposes. Nowhere is this more pertinent than in the imaging of children and, following the recent introduction of the Ionising Radiation (Medical Exposure) Regulations, there is now a regulatory requirement for diagnostic radiology departments to demonstrate compliance with these principles. A study was undertaken to compare all aspects of paediatric radiological practice at two specialist and two non-specialist centres. An initial study involved analysis of nearly 3000 patient doses. The second phase of the project involved assessment of referral criteria, radiographic technique and approximately 100 radiographs at each centre by two consultant paediatric radiologists. While all radiographs were found to be diagnostically acceptable, major differences in technique were evident, reflecting the disparity in experience between staff at the specialist and non-specialist centres. The large number of sub-optimum films encountered at the latter suggests that there is a need for specific training of less experienced radiographic and clinical staff.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. Milkovic, V. Garaj-Vrhovac, M. Ranogajec-Komor, S. Miljanic, G. Gajski, Z. Knezevic, and N. Beck Primary DNA Damage Assessed With the Comet Assay and Comparison to the Absorbed Dose of Diagnostic X-rays in Children International Journal of Toxicology, September 1, 2009; 28(5): 405 - 416. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. Datz, A. Ben-Shlomo, D. Bader, S. Sadetzki, A. Juster-Reicher, K. Marks, T. Smolkin, S. Zangen, and M. Margaliot The additional dose to radiosensitive organs caused by using under-collimated X-ray beams in neonatal intensive care radiography Radiat Prot Dosimetry, July 1, 2008; 130(4): 518 - 524. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E D Dougeni, H B Delis, A A Karatza, C P Kalogeropoulou, S G Skiadopoulos, S P Mantagos, and G S Panayiotakis Dose and image quality optimization in neonatal radiography Br. J. Radiol., October 1, 2007; 80(958): 807 - 815. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M P Hiorns, A Saini, and P J Marsden A review of current local dose-area product levels for paediatric fluoroscopy in a tertiary referral centre compared with national standards. Why are they so different? Br. J. Radiol., April 1, 2006; 79(940): 326 - 330. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Donadieu, A. Zeghnoun, C. Roudier, C. Maccia, P. Pirard, C. Andre, C. Adamsbaum, G. Kalifa, P. Legmann, and P.-H. Jarreau Cumulative Effective Doses Delivered by Radiographs to Preterm Infants in a Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Pediatrics, March 1, 2006; 117(3): 882 - 888. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A C Offiah and C M Hall Evaluation of the Commission of the European Communities quality criteria for the paediatric lateral spine Br. J. Radiol., December 1, 2003; 76(912): 885 - 890. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]