BJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Conry, B G
Right arrow Articles by Burwood, R J
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Conry, B G
Right arrow Articles by Burwood, R J
British Journal of Radiology 74 (2001),715-719 © 2001 The British Institute of Radiology

Full paper

Radionuclide radiologist directed nuclear medicine services in district general hospitals in the South Thames Region

B G Conry, MRCP, FRCR 1 R J Burwood, MD, FRCR 2 and on behalf of South Thames Regional Nuclear Medicine Specialty Service Committee

1Pembury Hospital, Pembury, Tunbridge Wells, Kent TN2 4QJ and 2Royal Sussex County Hospital, Eastern Road, Brighton, West Sussex BN2 5BE, UK

The equipment, staffing levels and imaging workload of all 14 radiologist directed nuclear medicine services in district general hospitals in the South Thames Region are presented. These are generally single camera departments providing a broad range of imaging procedures, including cardiac studies and white cell labelling, as well as the more usual renal, lung, thyroid and bone examinations. All departments have a high throughput, averaging 2358 examinations per year. Departmental staffing levels are variable, with some institutions having inadequate consultant radiology sessions free of other commitments as well as inadequate physics support. Potentially, these are important quality and legal issues that departments may need to address with hospital Trusts and Commissioning Agencies. Four small departments provided a service without any formally contracted radiologist sessions for nuclear medicine in the radiologists' job plans. The three medium sized departments have a closer match between sessions contracted and those actually worked, but in only one of these did the contracted sessional commitment equal the recommendation of the Nuclear Medicine Committee of the Royal College of Physicians. There is a disparity between the number of contracted consultant sessions and those actually worked in most institutions (86%), being at least two sessions in eight hospitals. Recommendations are made regarding the adequacy of some of the elements of provision in South Thames and the legal and safety implications for hospital Trust management and Commissioning Agencies.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
B G Conry, C W N Wetton, and J J Flanagan
Limited ARSAC licence acquisition for radionuclide radiology
Br. J. Radiol., July 1, 2005; 78(931): 631 - 633.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING  ALL BIR JOURNALS 
Copyright © 2001 by the British Institute of Radiology.