This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Yip, W M Articles by Kwok, C S Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Yip, W M Articles by Kwok, C S

ROC curve analysis of lesion detectability on phantoms: comparison of digital spot mammography with conventional spot mammography

Department of Optometry and Radiography, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong Kong

Correspondence: Dr Cheuk Sang Kwok

Although conventional screen–film mammography has excellent spatial resolution and is commonly used as a screening tool, certain inherent limitations prevent its further improvement. New digital mammography techniques, despite lower spatial resolution than screen–film mammography, may overcome these limitations. This study compared lesion detectability between charge coupled device-based digital spot mammography and conventional spot mammography. A total of 100 sets of images of specially designed breast phantoms was acquired, with variable background achieved by overlapping several layers of grapefruit fibre on a 4 cm thick lucite slab, using both modalities. 75 sets were "normal" images and 25 sets were images with simulated lesions. Four radiologists assessed the images according to a five-point confidence scale. The results were used to construct receiver operating characteristic curves. No statistical difference was observed between the two sets of curves for individual radiologists as well as pooled data. The lower spatial resolution of digital mammography was compensated for by its higher contrast sensitivity relative to conventional spot mammography.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				K. B. Krug, H. Stutzer, R. Schroder, J. Boecker, J. Poggenborg, and K. Lackner Image Quality of Digital Direct Flat-Panel Mammography Versus an Analog Screen-Film Technique Using a Low-Contrast Phantom Am. J. Roentgenol., September 1, 2008; 191(3): W80 - W88. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. B. Krug, H. Stutzer, R. Girnus, M. Zahringer, A. Gossmann, G. Winnekendonk, and K. Lackner Image Quality of Digital Direct Flat-Panel Mammography Versus an Analog Screen-Film Technique Using a Phantom Model Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2007; 188(2): 399 - 407. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. H. Kim, E. D. Pisano, E. B. Cole, M. R. Jiroutek, K. E. Muller, Y. Zheng, C. M. Kuzmiak, and M. A. Koomen Comparison of calcification specificity in digital mammography using soft-copy display versus screen-film mammography. Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2006; 187(1): 47 - 50. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]