BJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Meeson, S
Right arrow Articles by Wallis, M G
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Meeson, S
Right arrow Articles by Wallis, M G
British Journal of Radiology 74 (2001),615-620 © 2001 The British Institute of Radiology

Full paper

Procedure for quantitatively assessing automatic exposure control in mammography: a study of the GE Senographe 600 TS

S Meeson, PhD 1, K C Young, PhD 1 P B Hollaway, MSc 2 and M G Wallis, FRCR 3

1National Co-ordinating Centre for the Physics of Mammography and 2Regional Radiation Protection Service, Department of Medical Physics, St Luke's Wing, Royal Surrey County Hospital, Guildford GU2 7XX, and 3Warwickshire, Solihull & Coventry Breast Screening Centre, Coventry and Warwickshire Hospital, Stoney Stanton Road, Coventry CV1 4FH, UK

The correct operation of a mammography system's automatic exposure control system (AEC) is essential if mammograms are to be produced with a suitable film exposure. A methodology has been developed that allows the performance of the AEC to be assessed quantitatively using clinical films. By digitizing mammograms, the mean optical density (OD) in the main breast region and in a region of interest corresponding to the position of the AEC detector are evaluated for each film, together with the area of the main breast. Using these data it is possible to determine the relationships between the mean OD, breast size and AEC detector position. The performance of the AEC on a GE Senographe 600 TS system was investigated. The study found that there is a tendency to underexpose smaller breasts, i.e. with an area less than approximately 4000 mm2. This is equivalent to a compressed tissue width of approximately 60–80 mm. The difference in mean OD between the mammograms of small and large breasts was up to 0.7 OD. Provided the sensitive area of the AEC detector is known, this method of assessing AEC performance can be used with any mammography system.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING  ALL BIR JOURNALS 
Copyright © 2001 by the British Institute of Radiology.