This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Crawley, M T Articles by Wainwright, A Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Crawley, M T Articles by Wainwright, A

A practical approach to the first iteration in the optimization of radiation dose and image quality in CT: estimates of the collective dose savings achieved

Radiology Department, Stoke Mandeville Hospital, Mandeville Road, Aylesbury, Buckinghamshire HP21 8AL, UK

CT is a diagnostic imaging modality giving higher patient dose in comparison with other radiological procedures. It contributed an estimated 20% to the collective effective dose to the UK population from medical X-rays in 1990, rising to an estimated 40% in 1999. Tremendous national effort has been expended in reducing patient doses from other radiological procedures with considerable success, but much of the collective dose reduction achieved has been offset by a corresponding increase in the collective dose from CT. Over a period of about 2 years, following the installation of a helical CT scanner, CT scan parameters in this hospital have been adjusted with the aim of working towards optimization of image quality and patient dose. A 33% reduction in annual collective effective dose has been achieved, from about 16.5 manSv to 11 manSv. However, despite this dose reduction, the annual collective effective dose to our sub-population is 2.8 times the value 9 years ago. The increase is almost entirely the result of an increased application of CT; 6149 examinations per annum in 1999 compared with 2210 in 1991. The crucial importance of reducing patient doses from this modality is discussed. Indicative effective doses and image noise values are presented for examination protocols approaching optimization.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. Menke Comparison of Different Body Size Parameters for Individual Dose Adaptation in Body CT of Adults Radiology, August 1, 2005; 236(2): 565 - 571. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L M Moran, R Rodriguez, A Calzado, A Turrero, A Arenas, A Cuevas, B Garcia-Castano, N Gomez, and P Moran Image quality and dose evaluation in spiral chest CT examinations of patients with lung carcinoma Br. J. Radiol., October 1, 2004; 77(922): 839 - 846. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. K. Kalra, M. M. Maher, T. L. Toth, L. M. Hamberg, M. A. Blake, J.-A. Shepard, and S. Saini Strategies for CT Radiation Dose Optimization Radiology, March 1, 2004; 230(3): 619 - 628. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. K. Kalra, C. Wittram, M. M. Maher, A. Sharma, G. B. Avinash, K. Karau, T. L. Toth, E. Halpern, S. Saini, and J.-A. Shepard Can Noise Reduction Filters Improve Low-Radiation-Dose Chest CT Images? Pilot Study Radiology, July 1, 2003; 228(1): 257 - 264. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]