BJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rathaus, V
Right arrow Articles by Zissin, R
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rathaus, V
Right arrow Articles by Zissin, R
British Journal of Radiology 74 (2001),595-601 © 2001 The British Institute of Radiology

Full paper

Pyelocalyceal diverticulum: the imaging spectrum with emphasis on the ultrasound features

V Rathaus 1 O Konen 1 M Werner 1 M Shapiro Feinberg 1 M Grunebaum 2 and R Zissin 1

1Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Sapir Medical Center and 2Veteran Pediatric Radiologist, Sapir Medical Center, Kfar Saba and Sackler Medical School, Tel Aviv University, Israel

Clinical and imaging data of 11 patients with pyelocalyceal diverticulum were retrospectively examined. Four patients suffered from ipsilateral flank pain, one from recurrent urinary tract infection and the other six from unrelated symptoms. All patients underwent ultrasound as the initial imaging study. In two cases ultrasound was the only examination performed. Additional imaging studies were obtained in the other nine patients (abdominal radiography in six cases, intravenous urography (IVU) in five and CT in four). Ultrasound suggested the diagnosis of pyelocalyceal diverticulum in eight cases owing to the presence of echogenic and mobile material within the cyst-like lesion. In three cases the ultrasound appearance was similar and indistinguishable from a simple cyst and the diagnosis was made by another imaging study IVU in two cases and CT in one). We suggest that ultrasound examination is the best imaging method for the diagnosis of a pyelocalyceal diverticulum, and no further imaging modalities are required when mobile echogenic material is seen. In uncertain cases, another relatively inexpensive imaging study should be added such as abdominal radiography or IVU.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING  ALL BIR JOURNALS 
Copyright © 2001 by the British Institute of Radiology.