BJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dinkel, H-P
Right arrow Articles by Debus, S
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dinkel, H-P
Right arrow Articles by Debus, S
British Journal of Radiology 74 (2001),590-594 © 2001 The British Institute of Radiology

Full paper

Colour flow Doppler ultrasound of the carotid bifurcation: can it replace routine angiography before carotid endarterectomy?

H-P Dinkel, MD 1 R Moll, MD 1 and S Debus, MD 2

Departments of 1Diagnostic Radiology and 2Surgery, University of Würzburg, Josef-Schneider-Strasse 2, D-97080 Würzburg, Germany

Correspondence: Dr H-P Dinkel, Institut für Diagnostische Radiologie, Inselspital, CH 3010 Bern, Switzerland

The objective of this study was to assess the diagnostic accuracy of colour flow Doppler ultrasound (CFD) and its potential to replace digital subtraction angiography (DSA) before carotid endarterectomy (CEA). All patients undergoing CFD of the carotid bifurcation in our department over a period of 1½ years for whom both CFD and DSA results were available were included in the study. We evaluated the feasibility of CFD, its diagnostic accuracy and its potential to diagnose clinically significant stenosis (50%, 70% and 90% NASCET type diameter stenosis) compared with DSA. 225 carotid bifurcations in 116 patients met the criteria for evaluation (biplane arterial DSA without superimposition). Data analysis yielded the following diagnostic performance of CFD: sensitivity for a 50% stenosis 91.4% (95% confidence interval (CI) 83.3–96.2%), specificity 93.2% (95% CI 87.1–96.8%) and accuracy 92.4% (95% CI 88.4–95.4%); sensitivity for a 70% stenosis 89.2% (95% CI 81.9–94.1%), specificity 96.2% (95% CI 90.5–98.6%) and accuracy 92.4% (95% CI 88.4–95.4%). In 9 of 116 cases, carotid angiography was used to evaluate inconclusive CFD results. DSA disclosed relevant information not suspected by CFD in only 1 of the 116 cases. Thus, 91% (106/116) of the angiographies could have been dispensed with without loss of information. One major stroke occurred during diagnostic DSA. We conclude that DSA of the carotid arteries is unnecessary when CFD is unequivocal. The diagnostic gain of DSA must be counterweighted against its potential risks.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
S. Sabeti, M. Schillinger, W. Mlekusch, A. Willfort, M. Haumer, T. Nachtmann, M. Mullner, W. Lang, R. Ahmadi, and E. Minar
Quantification of Internal Carotid Artery Stenosis with Duplex US: Comparative Analysis of Different Flow Velocity Criteria
Radiology, August 1, 2004; 232(2): 431 - 439.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
J. S. Kriegshauser, M. D. Patel, and K. D. Nelson
Carotid Pseudostring Sign From Vasa Vasorum Collaterals
J. Ultrasound Med., September 1, 2003; 22(9): 959 - 963.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING  ALL BIR JOURNALS 
Copyright © 2001 by the British Institute of Radiology.