BJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sandborg, M
Right arrow Articles by Alm Carlsson, G
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sandborg, M
Right arrow Articles by Alm Carlsson, G
British Journal of Radiology 74 (2001),520-528 © 2001 The British Institute of Radiology

Full paper

Demonstration of correlations between clinical and physical image quality measures in chest and lumbar spine screen–film radiography

M Sandborg, PhD 1, A Tingberg, PhD 2 D R Dance, PhD 3 B Lanhede, MSc 4 A Almén, PhD 2 G McVey, BSc, MSc 3 P Sund, MSc 4 S Kheddache, PhD, MD 5 J Besjakov, MD, PhD 6 S Mattsson, PhD 2 L G Månsson, PhD 4 and G Alm Carlsson, PhD 1

1Department of Radiation Physics, Faculty of Health Sciences, Linköping University, SE 581 85 Linköping, Sweden, Departments of 2Radiation Physics and 6Diagnostic Radiology at Malmö, Lund University, Malmö University Hospital, SE 205 02 Malmö, Sweden, 3Joint Department of Physics, The Royal Marsden NHS Trust, Fulham Road, London SW3 6JJ, UK, and Departments of 4Radiation Physics and 5Radiology, Göteborg University, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, SE 413 45 Göteborg, Sweden

The ability to predict clinical image quality from physical measures is useful for optimization in diagnostic radiology. In this work, clinical and physical assessments of image quality are compared and correlations between the two are derived. Clinical assessment has been made by a group of expert radiologists who evaluated fulfilment of the European image criteria for chest and lumbar spine radiography using two scoring methods: image criteria score (ICS) and visual grading analysis score (VGAS). Physical image quality measures were calculated using a Monte Carlo simulation model of the complete imaging system. This model includes a voxelized male anatomy and was used to calculate contrast and signal-to-noise ratio of various important anatomical details and measures of dynamic range. Correlations between the physical image quality measures on the one hand and the ICS and VGAS on the other were sought. 16 chest and 4 lumbar spine imaging system configurations were compared in frontal projection. A statistically significant correlation with clinical image quality was found in chest posteroanterior radiography for the contrast of blood vessels in the retrocardiac area and a measure of useful dynamic range. In lumbar spine anteroposterior radiography, a similar significant correlation with clinical image quality was found between the contrast and signal-to-noise ratio of the trabecular structures in the L1–L5 vertebrae. The significant correlation shows that clinical image quality can, at least in some cases, be predicted from appropriate measures of physical image quality.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Radiat Prot DosimetryHome page
M. J. Tapiovaara
Review of relationships between physical measurements and user evaluation of image quality
Radiat Prot Dosimetry, March 1, 2008; 129(1-3): 244 - 248.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Br. J. Radiol.Home page
M Bath and L G Mansson
Visual grading characteristics (VGC) analysis: a non-parametric rank-invariant statistical method for image quality evaluation
Br. J. Radiol., March 1, 2007; 80(951): 169 - 176.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Radiat Prot DosimetryHome page
S. Borjesson, M. Hakansson, M. Bath, S. Kheddache, S. Svensson, A. Tingberg, A. Grahn, M. Ruschin, B. Hemdal, S. Mattsson, et al.
A software tool for increased efficiency in observer performance studies in radiology
Radiat Prot Dosimetry, May 17, 2005; 114(1-3): 45 - 52.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Radiat Prot DosimetryHome page
M. Bath, M. Hakansson, J. Hansson, and L. G. Mansson
A conceptual optimisation strategy for radiography in a digital environment
Radiat Prot Dosimetry, May 17, 2005; 114(1-3): 230 - 235.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Radiat Prot DosimetryHome page
H. Geijer and J. Persliden
Varied tube potential with constant effective dose at lumbar spine radiography using a flat-panel digital detector
Radiat Prot Dosimetry, May 17, 2005; 114(1-3): 240 - 245.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Br. J. Radiol.Home page
A Tingberg, C Herrmann, B Lanhede, A Almen, M Sandborg, G McVey, S Mattsson, W Panzer, J Besjakov, L G Mansson, et al.
Influence of the characteristic curve on the clinical image quality of lumbar spine and chest radiographs
Br. J. Radiol., March 1, 2004; 77(915): 204 - 215.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Dentomaxillofac RadiolHome page
B Molander, H-G Grondahl, and A Ekestubbe
Quality of film-based and digital panoramic radiography
Dentomaxillofac. Radiol., January 1, 2004; 33(1): 32 - 36.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Dentomaxillofac RadiolHome page
A Ekestubbe, H-G Grondahl, and B Molander
Quality of digital pre-implant tomography: comparison of film-screen images with storage phosphor images at normal and low dose
Dentomaxillofac. Radiol., September 1, 2003; 32(5): 322 - 326.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Br. J. Radiol.Home page
G McVey, M Sandborg, D R Dance, and G Alm Carlsson
A study and optimization of lumbar spine X-ray imaging systems
Br. J. Radiol., March 1, 2003; 76(903): 177 - 188.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING  ALL BIR JOURNALS 
Copyright © 2001 by the British Institute of Radiology.