This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Mittal, T K Articles by Wood, A M Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Mittal, T K Articles by Wood, A M

Renal arteriography using gadolinium enhanced 3D MR angiography—clinical experience with the technique, its limitations and pitfalls

¹Department of Radiology, Leeds General Infirmary, Great George Street, Leeds LS1 3EX, UK and ²Department of Clinical Radiology, University Hospital of Wales, Heath Park, Cardiff CF4 4XW, UK

Correspondence: Dr T K Mittal, Cardiac MRI Unit, B Floor, Clarendon Wing, Leeds General Infirmary, Great George Street, Leeds LS1 3EX, UK

Gadolinium enhanced 3D MR angiography (MRA) is becoming a widely accepted technique for imaging the vascular system. We set out to evaluate its accuracy and reliability in visualization of renal arteries in the clinical setting. Gadolinium enhanced MRA was performed in 15 potential live renal donors and 26 patients suspected of having renal artery stenosis who were referred for digital subtraction angiography (DSA). MRA was performed on a 1.5 T MR scanner in a single breath hold. Images from each study were prospectively analysed for demonstration of number of main and accessory renal arteries and degree of renal artery stenosis in a double blind fashion. All the main and accessory arteries were visualized on MRA in the renal donor group, but in one case a branch was not identified owing to breathing artefact. In one case, an extrarenal vascular anomaly was not demonstrated on MRA. In the renal artery stenosis group, sensitivity, specificity and negative predictive values of 96%, 93% and 96% were obtained for clinically significant stenosis (>50%). Gadolinium enhanced MRA proved to be a useful technique in demonstration of renal arterial anatomy and grading of renal artery stenosis. However, we encountered some pitfalls and limitations of the technique during the process. It is important to be aware of these before accepting it as the sole technique in clinical practice.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				G. Soulez, M. Pasowicz, G. Benea, L. Grazioli, J. P. Niedmann, M. Konopka, P. C. Douek, G. Morana, F. K. W. Schaefer, A. Vanzulli, et al. Renal Artery Stenosis Evaluation: Diagnostic Performance of Gadobenate Dimeglumine-enhanced MR Angiography--Comparison with DSA Radiology, April 1, 2008; 247(1): 273 - 285. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. H. Maki, G. J. Wilson, W. B. Eubank, D. J. Glickerman, J. A. Millan, and R. M. Hoogeveen Navigator-Gated MR Angiography of the Renal Arteries: A Potential Screening Tool for Renal Artery Stenosis Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2007; 188(6): W540 - W546. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. C. J. M. Kock, J. N. M. Ijzermans, K. Visser, S. M. Hussain, W. Weimar, P. M. T. Pattynama, G. P. Krestin, and M. G. M. Hunink Contrast-Enhanced MR Angiography and Digital Subtraction Angiography in Living Renal Donors: Diagnostic Agreement, Impact on Decision Making, and Costs Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2005; 185(2): 448 - 456. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Prokop, G. Schneider, A. Vanzulli, M. Goyen, S. G. Ruehm, P. Douek, M. Dapra, G. Pirovano, M. A. Kirchin, and A. Spinazzi Contrast-enhanced MR Angiography of the Renal Arteries: Blinded Multicenter Crossover Comparison of Gadobenate Dimeglumine and Gadopentetate Dimeglumine Radiology, February 1, 2005; 234(2): 399 - 408. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. J. Pennell, U. P. Sechtem, C. B. Higgins, W. J. Manning, G. M. Pohost, F. E. Rademakers, A. C. van Rossum, L. J. Shaw, and E. K. Yucel Clinical indications for cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR): Consensus Panel report Eur. Heart J., November 1, 2004; 25(21): 1940 - 1965. [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Gupta and R. Tello Accessory Renal Arteries Are Not Related to Hypertension Risk: A Review of MR Angiography Data Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2004; 182(6): 1521 - 1524. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. O. Bude, A. R. Forauer, E. M. Caoili, and H. V. Nghiem Is It Necessary to Study Accessory Arteries When Screening the Renal Arteries for Renovascular Hypertension? Radiology, February 1, 2003; 226(2): 411 - 416. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]