BJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Canney, P A
Right arrow Articles by Wheldon, T
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Canney, P A
Right arrow Articles by Wheldon, T
British Journal of Radiology 74 (2001),262-265 © 2001 The British Institute of Radiology

Short communication

Variation in the probability of cardiac complications with radiation technique in early breast cancer

P A Canney, MD, FRCR1, R Sanderson, MSc2, C Deehan, PhD2 and T Wheldon, PhD3

1 Departments of Radiation Oncology
2 Clinical Physics, Beatson Oncology Centre, Western Infirmary, Dumbarton Road, Glasgow G11 6NT
3 Department of Radiation Oncology, Glasgow University, CRC Beatson Laboratories, Glasgow G61 1BD, UK

Cardiac damage is recognized to be a potentially serious side effect of breast cancer radiotherapy, the risk of which may be reduced by the choice of appropriate radiotherapy technique. We have previously described variation in physical dose to the heart dependent upon radiotherapy technique. In this paper we report the calculated improvement in normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) (for cardiac damage) achievable by these methods. Cardiac doses were calculated from dose–volume histograms (DVHs) using a "Helax" planning system for 11 patients with left-sided tumours and 5 patients with right-sided tumours. The DVH reduction algorithm of Lyman and Wolbarst [1989] was applied to each DVH to produce a value for the NTCP. For left-sided tumours, mean NTCP with the standard technique was 7.4±5.6% (range 0.6–17%) and for the optimum technique mean NTCP was 0.3±0.6% (range 0–2%) (p<0.003 for the difference between the two techniques): a predicted reduction in late cardiac complications of 23-fold, which is not clearly evident from viewing the DVH raw data.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING  ALL BIR JOURNALS 
Copyright © 2001 by the British Institute of Radiology.