BJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vehmas, T
Right arrow Articles by Kuosma, E
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Vehmas, T
Right arrow Articles by Kuosma, E
British Journal of Radiology 74 (2001),255-258 © 2001 The British Institute of Radiology

Full paper

Influence of radiologists' sex and training on fluoroscopy doses during barium enema

T Vehmas, MD1,2 and E Kuosma, MSc1

1 The Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, Topeliuksenkatu 41 a A, Helsinki, FIN-00250 Helsinki
2 The Department of Radiology, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Finland

Correspondence: Dr T Vehmas, The Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, Topeliuksenkatu 41 a A, FIN-00250 Helsinki, Finland

Variables influencing radiation exposure were studied using analysis of covariance in 523 double contrast barium enemas performed by 21 radiology residents (12 female, 9 male). Dose–area products (DAPs) (ns), number of exposures per patient (p<0.05) and screening times (p<0.05) were higher for female residents (mean 52.0 Gy cm2, 9.55 exposures and 4.02 min, respectively) than for male residents (mean 41.7 Gy cm2, 8.26 exposures and 3.20 min, respectively). The number of lectures on radiation protection attended by the resident (range 0–20) had no significant effect on these radiation-related variables. Other factors explaining these variables were patient age, diagnosis and anteroposterior thickness. Radiologists' use of ionizing radiation during fluoroscopy may be sex-related. Traditional lecture-based education on radiation protection was not effective with this group; thus, improved methods should be developed to control doses.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING  ALL BIR JOURNALS 
Copyright © 2001 by the British Institute of Radiology.