This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Nalder, C A Articles by Beardmore, C Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Nalder, C A Articles by Beardmore, C

Influence of a vac-fix immobilization device on the accuracy of patient positioning during routine breast radiotherapy

¹ Departments of Physics
² Radiotherapy and Oncology, Royal Marsden NHS Trust, Fulham Road, London SW3 6JJ, UK

Continued use of basic planning and treatment techniques, in contrast to the improved methods implemented at many other anatomical sites, has emphasized the need for improved breast dosimetry. Any future technique delivering a superior three-dimensional dose distribution will be of maximum benefit if set-up errors are minimized. To determine the influence of vacuum moulded bag (vac-fix) immobilization on routine breast radiotherapy, 17 patients received half their radiotherapy fractions using our standard breast board technique and half using a vac-fix device positioned on the breast board. Treatment accuracy and reproducibility were assessed for each technique using daily electronic portal imaging and were analysed in terms of random and systematic translational and rotational displacements of treatment fields with respect to corresponding simulation images. In addition, patients completed a short questionnaire aimed at determining which technique they preferred. Results showed that random errors for the two techniques did not differ significantly. Approximately 80% of random translations recorded were less than 3 mm and 80% of random rotations were less than 1.5°. Systematic errors showed some improvement with the vac-fix system. In the anteroposterior direction, approximately 80% of systematic errors were less than 4 mm for both techniques, but in the superoinferior direction the 80% point was reduced from 5.0 mm for the standard set-up to 2.7 mm for treatment in vac-fix. For rotational systematic errors, the corresponding value dropped from 1.8° for the standard set-up to 1.1° in vac-fix. Therefore, for many patients, additional use of a vac-fix device improved the transfer of the planned set-up from simulator to treatment unit. Additionally, answers to the questionnaire indicated that patients generally favoured the vac-fix system over use of the breast board alone. In conclusion, however, introduction of vac-fix immobilization for all patients was not thought justified as the improvements demonstrated are not likely to be clinically significant with the present treatment technique.