BJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Malich, A
Right arrow Articles by Kaiser, W A
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Malich, A
Right arrow Articles by Kaiser, W A
British Journal of Radiology 74 (2001),42-47 © 2001 The British Institute of Radiology

Full paper

Electrical impedance scanning: a new technique in the diagnosis of lymph nodes in which malignancy is suspected on ultrasound

A Malich, MD1, T Fritsch1, C Mauch, MD2, T Boehm, MD1, M Freesmeyer, MD1, M Fleck, MD1, R Anderson3 and W A Kaiser, MD1

1 Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology
2 Department of Radiology, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Bachstrasse 18, D-07740 Jena
3 Siemens Medical Engineering, Special Systems—Women's Health, Henkestrasse 127, D-91052 Erlangen, Germany

Differentiation between inflammatory and malignant lymph nodes by ultrasound is difficult. Electrical impedance scanning (EIS) is a new diagnostic tool, so far used primarily for the identification of malignant breast lesions. Cancer cells have altered dielectric properties compared with normal cells, thereby distorting the local electrical field. The induced changes in capacitance and conductivity are measurable using EIS. We evaluated EIS in demonstrating the cause of lymph node enlargement. 51 lymph nodes that were suspicious for malignancy on ultrasound (32 patients, mean age 32 years), with a mean size of 18 mmx12 mmx10 mm, were examined. The following lymph node locations were included in the study: cervical, inframandibular, axillary, paraaortic and inguinal. EIS results were compared with histopathological and follow-up findings. 30/34 malignant lymph nodes were correctly detected using EIS, while 14/17 inflammatory or benign lymph nodes were correctly identified as benign by EIS; thus, there were 4/51 false negative and 3/51 false positive cases. The sensitivity was 88.2% and the specificity was 82.4%. Corresponding negative and positive predictive values were 77.8% and 90.9%, respectively. Results from this initial study suggest the potential usefulness of EIS as an adjunctive imaging modality in the differentiation of lymphadenopathy that is equivocal on ultrasound. The best accuracy was obtained in the cervical, axillary and inguinal regions. Owing to technical restrictions of the present system, examination of inframandibular and paraaortic lymph nodes should be limited to special cases.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Ann. Surg. Oncol.Home page
A. Stojadinovic, S. I. Fields, C. D. Shriver, S. Lenington, R. Ginor, G. E. Peoples, H. B. Burch, T. Peretz, H. R. Freund, and A. Nissan
Electrical Impedance Scanning of Thyroid Nodules Before Thyroid Surgery: A Prospective Study
Ann. Surg. Oncol., February 1, 2005; 12(2): 152 - 160.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING  ALL BIR JOURNALS 
Copyright © 2001 by the British Institute of Radiology.