The British Journal of Radiology, Vol 73, Issue 875 1192-1199, Copyright © 2000 by British Institute of Radiology

ARTICLES

The influence of different technique factors on image quality of lumbar spine radiographs as evaluated by established CEC image criteria

A Almen, A Tingberg, S Mattsson, J Besjakov, S Kheddache, B Lanhede, LG Mansson and M Zankl
Department of Radiation Physics, Malmo University Hospital, SE-205 02 Malmo, Sweden.

In this study we have investigated the image quality of lumbar spine radiographs taken after recording technical and physical parameters. Two technical parameters were altered, tube voltage (70 kV and 90 kV for the anteroposterior (AP) projection and 77 kV and 95 kV for the lateral projection) and sensitivity of the film-screen system (sensitivity class 400 and 600). In total, 85 images were included in the study. Entrance surface dose (ESD) was measured using thermoluminescent dosemeters. The mean value of ESD for the different technique groups varied between 1.9 mGy (90 kV, sensitivity class 400) and 4.6 mGy (70 kV, sensitivity class 400) for the AP projection, and between 6.4 mGy (95 kV, sensitivity class 600) and 20.4 mGy (70 kV, sensitivity class 400) for the lateral projection. Image criteria given in the "European Guidelines on Quality Criteria for Radiographic Images" were used to assess image quality. Two evaluation methods have been employed. A straightforward scoring of fulfilled image criteria, and visual grading analysis using the structures defined in the image criteria. The latter method provided a sharper distinction between groups of images taken using different radiographic techniques. The average number of fulfilled image criteria for the AP projections varied between 0.74 (90 kV, sensitivity class 400) and 0.87 (70 kV, sensitivity class 400). For the lateral projection this number varied between 0.79 (95 kV, sensitivity class 600) and 0.84 (77 kV, sensitivity class 600). This study shows that image criteria are useful tools in clinical studies of image quality.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				G McVey The effect of phantom type, beam quality, field size and field position on X-ray scattering simulated using Monte Carlo techniques Br. J. Radiol., February 1, 2006; 79(938): 130 - 141. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Borjesson, M. Hakansson, M. Bath, S. Kheddache, S. Svensson, A. Tingberg, A. Grahn, M. Ruschin, B. Hemdal, S. Mattsson, et al. A software tool for increased efficiency in observer performance studies in radiology Radiat Prot Dosimetry, May 17, 2005; 114(1-3): 45 - 52. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Tingberg, M. Bath, M. Hakansson, J. Medin, J. Besjakov, M. Sandborg, G. Alm-Carlsson, S. Mattsson, and L. G. Mansson Evaluation of image quality of lumbar spine images: a comparison between FFE and VGA Radiat Prot Dosimetry, May 17, 2005; 114(1-3): 53 - 61. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Tingberg, F. Eriksson, J. Medin, J. Besjakov, M. Bath, M. Hakansson, M. Sandborg, A. Almen, B. Lanhede, G. Alm-Carlsson, et al. Inter-observer variation in masked and unmasked images for quality evaluation of clinical radiographs Radiat Prot Dosimetry, May 17, 2005; 114(1-3): 62 - 68. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. Geijer and J. Persliden Varied tube potential with constant effective dose at lumbar spine radiography using a flat-panel digital detector Radiat Prot Dosimetry, May 17, 2005; 114(1-3): 240 - 245. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Grahn, B. Hemdal, I. Andersson, M. Ruschin, A. Thilander-Klang, S. Borjesson, A. Tingberg, S. Mattsson, M. Hakansson, M. Bath, et al. Clinical evaluation of a new set of image quality criteria for mammography Radiat Prot Dosimetry, May 17, 2005; 114(1-3): 389 - 394. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A Tingberg, C Herrmann, B Lanhede, A Almen, M Sandborg, G McVey, S Mattsson, W Panzer, J Besjakov, L G Mansson, et al. Influence of the characteristic curve on the clinical image quality of lumbar spine and chest radiographs Br. J. Radiol., March 1, 2004; 77(915): 204 - 215. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B Molander, H-G Grondahl, and A Ekestubbe Quality of film-based and digital panoramic radiography Dentomaxillofac. Radiol., January 1, 2004; 33(1): 32 - 36. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A C Offiah and C M Hall Evaluation of the Commission of the European Communities quality criteria for the paediatric lateral spine Br. J. Radiol., December 1, 2003; 76(912): 885 - 890. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A Ekestubbe, H-G Grondahl, and B Molander Quality of digital pre-implant tomography: comparison of film-screen images with storage phosphor images at normal and low dose Dentomaxillofac. Radiol., September 1, 2003; 32(5): 322 - 326. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G McVey, M Sandborg, D R Dance, and G Alm Carlsson A study and optimization of lumbar spine X-ray imaging systems Br. J. Radiol., March 1, 2003; 76(903): 177 - 188. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B Lanhede, M Bath, S Kheddache, P Sund, L Bjorneld, M Widell, A Almen, J Besjakov, S Mattsson, A Tingberg, et al. The influence of different technique factors on image quality of chest radiographs as evaluated by modified CEC image quality criteria Br. J. Radiol., January 1, 2002; 75(889): 38 - 49. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M Sandborg, A Tingberg, D R Dance, B Lanhede, A Almen, G McVey, P Sund, S Kheddache, J Besjakov, S Mattsson, et al. Demonstration of correlations between clinical and physical image quality measures in chest and lumbar spine screen-film radiography Br. J. Radiol., January 1, 2001; 74(882): 520 - 528. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]