The British Journal of Radiology, Vol 73, Issue 875 1178-1184, Copyright © 2000 by British Institute of Radiology

ARTICLES

CT assessment of tumour response to treatment: comparison of linear, cross-sectional and volumetric measures of tumour size

SA Sohaib, B Turner, JA Hanson, M Farquharson, RT Oliver and RH Reznek
Department of Diagnostic Imaging, 59 Bartholomew's Close, St Bartholomew's Hospital, West Smithfield, London EC1A 7BE, UK.

Changes in cross-sectional area are currently used to assess tumour response to treatment. The aims of this study were to validate a helical CT technique for volume determination using a series of phantoms and to compare tumour responses indicated by one-, two- and three-dimensional measures of tumour size change in patients treated for germ cell cancer or lymphoma. All studies were performed on an IGE HiSpeed Advantage helical CT scanner with an Advantage Windows workstation. Phantom volumes were calculated using volume reconstruction software and compared with reference volumes determined by water displacement. 20 lymph node masses were studied on serial CT scans in 16 patients treated with chemotherapy for germ cell cancer or lymphoma. For each lesion the maximum diameter, maximum cross-sectional area and volume were determined before and after treatment. Tumour response was assessed using the standard World Health Organisation criteria (i.e. changes in cross-sectional area) and the newly proposed unidimensional response evaluation criteria in solid tumour (RECIST). The CT volume measurement error was 1.0-5.1% for regularly shaped phantoms larger than 35 cm3. In the assessment of treatment response there was 90% agreement between one-dimensional (1D) and two-dimensional (2D) measurements and 100% agreement between 2D and three-dimensional (3D) measurements. CT volume measurements are accurate and reproducible, particularly for larger structures. Assessment of tumour response using 1D, 2D and 3D measures had limited influence on the classification of treatment response. However, the impact of CT assessment of tumour response using 1D, 2D and 3D measurements on clinical decisions and patient outcome remains to be determined.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. Suzuki, H. Jacobsson, T. Hatschek, M. R. Torkzad, K. Boden, Y. Eriksson-Alm, E. Berg, H. Fujii, A. Kubo, and L. Blomqvist Radiologic Measurements of Tumor Response to Treatment: Practical Approaches and Limitations RadioGraphics, March 1, 2008; 28(2): 329 - 344. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. Griffin, M. E. Gore, and S. A. Sohaib Imaging in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2007; 189(2): 360 - 370. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. Yokomise, M. Gotoh, T. Okamoto, Y. Yamamoto, S. Ishikawa, T. Nakashima, D. Masuya, D. Liu, and C.-l. Huang Induction chemoradiotherapy (carboplatin-taxane and concurrent 50-Gy radiation) for bulky cN2, N3 non small cell lung cancer J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., May 1, 2007; 133(5): 1179 - 1185. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. C. Jaffe Measures of Response: RECIST, WHO, and New Alternatives J. Clin. Oncol., July 10, 2006; 24(20): 3245 - 3251. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. A. Mayr, W. T. C. Yuh, T. Taoka, J. Z. Wang, D. H. Wu, J. F. Montebello, S. L. Meeks, A. C. Paulino, V. A. Magnotta, M. Adli, et al. Serial therapy-induced changes in tumor shape in cervical cancer and their impact on assessing tumor volume and treatment response. Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2006; 187(1): 65 - 72. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				V. Petraitis, R. Petraitiene, J. Solomon, A. M. Kelaher, H. A. Murray, C. Mya-San, A. K. Bhandary, T. Sein, N. A. Avila, A. Basevicius, et al. Multidimensional volumetric imaging of pulmonary infiltrates for measuring therapeutic response to antifungal therapy in experimental invasive pulmonary aspergillosis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., April 1, 2006; 50(4): 1510 - 1517. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D Tait Advances in chemoradiation therapy in rectal cancer: the impact of imaging Br. J. Radiol., October 1, 2005; 78(Special_Issue_2): S131 - S137. [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. C. Partridge, J. E. Gibbs, Y. Lu, L. J. Esserman, D. Tripathy, D. S. Wolverton, H. S. Rugo, E. S. Hwang, C. A. Ewing, and N. M. Hylton MRI Measurements of Breast Tumor Volume Predict Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Recurrence-Free Survival Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2005; 184(6): 1774 - 1781. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Shankar, E. vanSonnenberg, J. Desai, P. J. DiPiro, A. Van Den Abbeele, and G. D. Demetri Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor: New Nodule-within-a-Mass Pattern of Recurrence after Partial Response to Imatinib Mesylate Radiology, June 1, 2005; 235(3): 892 - 898. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. O'Connell PET-CT Modification of RECIST Guidelines J Natl Cancer Inst, May 19, 2004; 96(10): 801 - 802. [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. O. Park, S. I. Lee, S. Y. Song, K. Kim, W. S. Kim, C. W. Jung, Y. S. Park, Y.-H. Im, W. K. Kang, M. H. Lee, et al. Measuring Response in Solid Tumors: Comparison of RECIST and WHO Response Criteria Jpn. J. Clin. Oncol., October 1, 2003; 33(10): 533 - 537. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. R. Prasad, K. S. Jhaveri, S. Saini, P. F. Hahn, E. F. Halpern, and J. E. Sumner CT Tumor Measurement for Therapeutic Response Assessment: Comparison of Unidimensional, Bidimensional, and Volumetric Techniques—Initial Observations Radiology, November 1, 2002; 225(2): 416 - 419. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]