The British Journal of Radiology, Vol 73, Issue 874 1056-1067, Copyright © 2000 by British Institute of Radiology

ARTICLES

Influence of anode/filter material and tube potential on contrast, signal-to-noise ratio and average absorbed dose in mammography: a Monte Carlo study

DR Dance, AK Thilander, M Sandborg, CL Skinner, IA Castellano and GA Carlsson
Joint Department of Physics, The Royal Marsden NHS Trust and Institute of Cancer Research, Fulham Road, London SW3 6JJ, UK.

The comparative performance of mammographic X-ray systems that use different anode/filter combinations has been assessed for screen-film and digital imaging. Monte Carlo techniques have been used to calculate average glandular dose as well as contrast and signal-to-noise ratio for imaging two test details. Five anode/filter combinations have been studied to establish the potential for dose saving or image quality improvement. For screen-film mammography, it was found that little benefit is gained by changing from a standard 28 kV molybdenum/molybdenum spectrum for breasts up to 6 cm thick. For thicker breasts, where the tube potential for the standard technique might be increased, 20% improvement in contrast can be achieved without dose penalty using molybdenum/rhodium or rhodium/rhodium spectra, whereas dose savings of more than 50% can be attained whilst maintaining contrast using tungsten/rhodium or rhodium/aluminium spectra. In digital mammography, a molybdenum/molybdenum spectrum delivers the lowest dose for a 2 cm breast, but gives the highest dose for thicker breasts. Tungsten/rhodium or rhodium/aluminium spectra provide the lowest doses at greater thicknesses. It is concluded that for screen-film mammography, molybdenum/molybdenum is the spectrum of choice for all but the thickest or most glandular breasts. In digital mammography, an alternative spectrum is preferable for breasts thicker than 2 cm.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R. S. Saunders Jr, E. Samei, J. Y. Lo, and J. A. Baker Can Compression Be Reduced for Breast Tomosynthesis? Monte Carlo Study on Mass and Microcalcification Conspicuity in Tomosynthesis Radiology, June 1, 2009; 251(3): 673 - 682. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. T. Bahreyni Toossi, H. Moradi, and H. Zare DXRAYSMCS: A USER-FRIENDLY INTERFACE DEVELOPED FOR PREDICTION OF DIAGNOSTIC RADIOLOGY X-RAY SPECTRA PRODUCED BY MONTE CARLO (MCNP-4C) SIMULATION Radiat Prot Dosimetry, January 3, 2009; (2009) ncn312v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. L. Smathers, J. M. Boone, L. J. Lee, E. A. Berns, R. A. Miller, and A. M. Wright Radiation Dose Reduction for Augmentation Mammography Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2007; 188(5): 1414 - 1421. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. Samei, R. S. Saunders Jr, J. A. Baker, and D. M. Delong Digital Mammography: Effects of Reduced Radiation Dose on Diagnostic Performance Radiology, May 1, 2007; 243(2): 396 - 404. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K C Young, J M Oduko, H Bosmans, K Nijs, and L Martinez Optimal beam quality selection in digital mammography Br. J. Radiol., December 1, 2006; 79(948): 981 - 990. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. Bosmans, A.-K. Carton, F. Rogge, F. Zanca, J. Jacobs, C. Van Ongeval, K. Nijs, A. Van Steen, and G. Marchal Image quality measurements and metrics in full field digital mammography: an overview Radiat Prot Dosimetry, December 1, 2005; 117(1-3): 120 - 130. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. K. Nishino, X. Wu, and R. F. Johnson Jr. Thickness of Molybdenum Filter and Squared Contrast-to-Noise Ratio per Dose for Digital Mammography Am. J. Roentgenol., October 1, 2005; 185(4): 960 - 963. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. R. Dance, R. A. Hunt, P. R. Bakic, A. D. A. Maidment, M. Sandborg, G. Ullman, and G. Alm Carlsson Breast dosimetry using high-resolution voxel phantoms Radiat Prot Dosimetry, May 17, 2005; 114(1-3): 359 - 363. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Klausz and N. Shramchenko Dose to population as a metric in the design of optimised exposure control in digital mammography Radiat Prot Dosimetry, May 17, 2005; 114(1-3): 369 - 374. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. A. Hunt, D. R. Dance, P. R. Bakic, A. D. A. Maidment, M. Sandborg, G. Ullman, and G. Alm Carlsson Calculation of the properties of digital mammograms using a computer simulation Radiat Prot Dosimetry, May 17, 2005; 114(1-3): 395 - 398. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. A. Hunt, D. R. Dance, M. Pachoud, G. Alm Carlsson, M. Sandborg, G. Ullman, and F. R. Verdun Monte Carlo simulation of a mammographic test phantom Radiat Prot Dosimetry, May 17, 2005; 114(1-3): 432 - 435. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. C. Aznar, J. Medin, B. Hemdal, A. Thilander Klang, L. Botter-Jensen, and S. Mattsson A Monte Carlo study of the energy dependence of Al2O3:C crystals for real-time in vivo dosimetry in mammography Radiat Prot Dosimetry, May 17, 2005; 114(1-3): 444 - 449. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S Obenauer, K-P Hermann, and E Grabbe Dose reduction in full-field digital mammography: an anthropomorphic breast phantom study Br. J. Radiol., July 1, 2003; 76(907): 478 - 482. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]