The British Journal of Radiology, Vol 73, Issue 874 1056-1067, Copyright © 2000 by British Institute of Radiology

ARTICLES

Influence of anode/filter material and tube potential on contrast, signal-to-noise ratio and average absorbed dose in mammography: a Monte Carlo study

DR Dance, AK Thilander, M Sandborg, CL Skinner, IA Castellano and GA Carlsson
Joint Department of Physics, The Royal Marsden NHS Trust and Institute of Cancer Research, Fulham Road, London SW3 6JJ, UK.

The comparative performance of mammographic X-ray systems that use different anode/filter combinations has been assessed for screen-film and digital imaging. Monte Carlo techniques have been used to calculate average glandular dose as well as contrast and signal-to-noise ratio for imaging two test details. Five anode/filter combinations have been studied to establish the potential for dose saving or image quality improvement. For screen-film mammography, it was found that little benefit is gained by changing from a standard 28 kV molybdenum/molybdenum spectrum for breasts up to 6 cm thick. For thicker breasts, where the tube potential for the standard technique might be increased, 20% improvement in contrast can be achieved without dose penalty using molybdenum/rhodium or rhodium/rhodium spectra, whereas dose savings of more than 50% can be attained whilst maintaining contrast using tungsten/rhodium or rhodium/aluminium spectra. In digital mammography, a molybdenum/molybdenum spectrum delivers the lowest dose for a 2 cm breast, but gives the highest dose for thicker breasts. Tungsten/rhodium or rhodium/aluminium spectra provide the lowest doses at greater thicknesses. It is concluded that for screen-film mammography, molybdenum/molybdenum is the spectrum of choice for all but the thickest or most glandular breasts. In digital mammography, an alternative spectrum is preferable for breasts thicker than 2 cm.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R. L. Smathers, J. M. Boone, L. J. Lee, E. A. Berns, R. A. Miller, and A. M. Wright Radiation Dose Reduction for Augmentation Mammography Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2007; 188(5): 1414 - 1421. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. Samei, R. S. Saunders Jr, J. A. Baker, and D. M. Delong Digital Mammography: Effects of Reduced Radiation Dose on Diagnostic Performance Radiology, May 1, 2007; 243(2): 396 - 404. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K C Young, J M Oduko, H Bosmans, K Nijs, and L Martinez Optimal beam quality selection in digital mammography Br. J. Radiol., December 1, 2006; 79(948): 981 - 990. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. Bosmans, A.-K. Carton, F. Rogge, F. Zanca, J. Jacobs, C. Van Ongeval, K. Nijs, A. Van Steen, and G. Marchal Image quality measurements and metrics in full field digital mammography: an overview Radiat Prot Dosimetry, December 1, 2005; 117(1-3): 120 - 130. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. K. Nishino, X. Wu, and R. F. Johnson Jr. Thickness of Molybdenum Filter and Squared Contrast-to-Noise Ratio per Dose for Digital Mammography Am. J. Roentgenol., October 1, 2005; 185(4): 960 - 963. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. R. Dance, R. A. Hunt, P. R. Bakic, A. D. A. Maidment, M. Sandborg, G. Ullman, and G. Alm Carlsson Breast dosimetry using high-resolution voxel phantoms Radiat Prot Dosimetry, May 17, 2005; 114(1-3): 359 - 363. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Klausz and N. Shramchenko Dose to population as a metric in the design of optimised exposure control in digital mammography Radiat Prot Dosimetry, May 17, 2005; 114(1-3): 369 - 374. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. A. Hunt, D. R. Dance, P. R. Bakic, A. D. A. Maidment, M. Sandborg, G. Ullman, and G. Alm Carlsson Calculation of the properties of digital mammograms using a computer simulation Radiat Prot Dosimetry, May 17, 2005; 114(1-3): 395 - 398. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. A. Hunt, D. R. Dance, M. Pachoud, G. Alm Carlsson, M. Sandborg, G. Ullman, and F. R. Verdun Monte Carlo simulation of a mammographic test phantom Radiat Prot Dosimetry, May 17, 2005; 114(1-3): 432 - 435. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. C. Aznar, J. Medin, B. Hemdal, A. Thilander Klang, L. Botter-Jensen, and S. Mattsson A Monte Carlo study of the energy dependence of Al2O3:C crystals for real-time in vivo dosimetry in mammography Radiat Prot Dosimetry, May 17, 2005; 114(1-3): 444 - 449. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S Obenauer, K-P Hermann, and E Grabbe Dose reduction in full-field digital mammography: an anthropomorphic breast phantom study Br. J. Radiol., July 1, 2003; 76(907): 478 - 482. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]