BJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hobby, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by Dixon, A. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hobby, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by Dixon, A. K.

The British Journal of Radiology, Vol 73, Issue 873 999-1001, Copyright © 2000 by British Institute of Radiology


ARTICLES

Communication of doubt and certainty in radiological reports

JL Hobby, BD Tom, C Todd, PW Bearcroft and AK Dixon
Orthopaedic Research Unit, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK.

We have investigated the reliability of communication of uncertainty in radiological reports. The 18 most commonly used verbal expressions of probability were identified from a series of radiological reports. 11 clinicians (three radiologists, three rheumatologists and five orthopaedic surgeons) recorded the probability that they ascribed to each of the 18 expressions using visual analogue scales. Each subject was re-tested on four occasions at least 1 week apart. The results were analysed to assess reproducibility within and between individuals. We found considerable variation in the probabilities assigned to many commonly used expressions between subjects, and between repeated testing of the same subject. Some expressions were rated much more consistently than others. "Absent", "excludes", "unlikely", "probable", "certain" and "definite" were the most consistently rated expressions. We have identified a potential source of misunderstanding in radiological reports owing to differences in interpretation of expressions used by radiologists and referring clinicians.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
A. J. Johnson, M. Y. M. Chen, J. S. Swan, K. E. Applegate, and B. Littenberg
Cohort Study of Structured Reporting Compared with Conventional Dictation
Radiology, October 1, 2009; 253(1): 74 - 80.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
P. W. P. Bearcroft, S. Guy, M. Bradley, and F. Robinson
MRI of the ankle: effect on diagnostic confidence and patient management.
Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2006; 187(5): 1327 - 1331.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
R. B. Gunderman
Education and the Art of Uncertainty
Radiology, December 1, 2005; 237(3): 801 - 802.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
G. C. Mueller, H. K. Hussain, R. C. Carlos, H. V. Nghiem, and I. R. Francis
Effectiveness of MR Imaging in Characterizing Small Hepatic Lesions: Routine Versus Expert Interpretation
Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2003; 180(3): 673 - 680.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
P MacEneaney
Re: Communication of doubt and uncertainty in radiological reports
Br. J. Radiol., December 1, 2002; 75(900): 1005 - 1005.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
A K Dixon
Author's reply
Br. J. Radiol., December 1, 2002; 75(900): 1005 - 1005.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
J. L. Hobby, A. K. Dixon, P. W. P. Bearcroft, B. D. M. Tom, D. J. Lomas, N. Rushton, and M. H. Matthewson
MR Imaging of the Wrist: Effect on Clinical Diagnosis and Patient Care
Radiology, September 1, 2001; 220(3): 589 - 593.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING  ALL BIR JOURNALS 
Copyright © 2000 by the British Institute of Radiology.