The British Journal of Radiology, Vol 73, Issue 873 973-977, Copyright © 2000 by British Institute of Radiology

ARTICLES

How should breathing motion be combined with other errors when drawing margins around clinical target volumes?

AL McKenzie
Medical Physics Department, Bristol Oncology Centre, UK.

Geometric uncertainties in radiotherapy treatment may be accommodated by drawing an adequate margin around the clinical target volume (CTV). The width of the margin is commonly based upon the quadrature sum of the standard deviations of the contributory errors. This approach is satisfactory when the probability distributions of the component errors are Gaussian, but breathing-induced motion of the CTV is generally not Gaussian. This paper shows that the blurred dose distribution D(z) arising from a step function beam edge that is moving cyclically along the z-axis is given by D(z) = 2t/tau, where t(z) relates time to position and tau is the cycle duration. Applying this relation to realistic breathing models results in a dose distribution in which the sharp edge of the step function is still evident even after blurring caused by the motion. This suggests that breathing-induced motion should be accounted for separately, with the breathing margin added linearly to the quadrature sum of the other contributing errors.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				G A WHITFIELD, A JACKSON, C MOORE, and P PRICE Radical chemoradiotherapy for adenocarcinoma of the distal oesophagus and oesophagogastric junction: what planning margins should we use? Br. J. Radiol., December 1, 2008; 81(972): 921 - 934. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				REFERENCES J. ICRU, December 1, 2007; 7(2): 189 - 210. [PDF]

				REFERENCES J. ICRU, June 1, 2004; 4(1): 95 - 100. [Full Text] [PDF]

				B Jones, E Aird, H Colyer, J Dobbs, R Harris, P Hoskin, A Mckenzie, and C West United Kingdom Radiation Oncology 1 Conference (UKRO 1): Accuracy and uncertainty in radiotherapy Br. J. Radiol., April 1, 2002; 75(892): 297 - 306. [Full Text] [PDF]