BJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rosso, R.
Right arrow Articles by Minisola, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rosso, R.
Right arrow Articles by Minisola, S.

The British Journal of Radiology, Vol 73, Issue 873 969-972, Copyright © 2000 by British Institute of Radiology

ARTICLES

Hip axis length in an Italian osteoporotic population

R Rosso and S Minisola
Dipartimento di Scienze Cliniche, Universita degli Studi di Roma La Sapienza, Italy.

Models proposed so far for the pathogenesis of osteoporosis often do not take into account the factors underlying the different incidences of hip fracture in different populations. To address this issue, we identified 34 female patients with hip fracture (HF) and 16 women with at least four vertebral fractures (VF) in a population-based retrospective study. Each participant had a bone mineral density (BMD) measurement of the lumbar spine and hip using a Hologic QDR-2000 scanner, in single beam mode for the latter site. Hip axis length (HAL) was determined automatically (precision 1.5%). HAL derived from 149 normal subjects (age range 19-75 years) was 10.3 +/- 0.5 cm. BMD values found at the femoral neck were almost similar, but differed significantly at the spine between the two groups. Mean values of femur HAL in HF patients (10.55 +/- 0.5 cm) were significantly higher compared with VF patients (9.85 +/- 0.54 cm; p < 0.001). Interestingly, both mean values differed significantly from the mean for normal subjects. Our results demonstrate that patients with multiple vertebral fractures have significantly lower vertebral BMD values but similar femoral neck values compared with patients who fracture at the hip; furthermore, hip axis length was more than 1 SD higher in these latter patients compared with that of VF patients. These results suggest that the size and shape of the hip can explain part of the observed aetiologic differences between these two types of osteoporotic fractures.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Br. J. Radiol.Home page
S Gnudi, N Malavolta, D Testi, and M Viceconti
Differences in proximal femur geometry distinguish vertebral from femoral neck fractures in osteoporotic women
Br. J. Radiol., March 1, 2004; 77(915): 219 - 223.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING  ALL BIR JOURNALS 
Copyright © 2000 by the British Institute of Radiology.