BJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dinkel, H. P.
Right arrow Articles by Tschammler, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dinkel, H. P.
Right arrow Articles by Tschammler, A.

The British Journal of Radiology, Vol 73, Issue 873 938-944, Copyright © 2000 by British Institute of Radiology

ARTICLES

Is the appearance of microcalcifications on mammography useful in predicting histological grade of malignancy in ductal cancer in situ?

HP Dinkel, AM Gassel and A Tschammler
Department of Radiology, University of Wurzburg, Germany.

It has been proposed that the grade of malignancy of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast can be estimated by the morphology of microcalcifications found on mammography. We correlated microcalcifications and histopathology in a retrospective blinded review. We reviewed all patients who underwent excisional breast biopsy over a 5 1/2-year period. Mammograms and pathology slides of all patients (n = 49) with DCIS of the breast were included in a blinded retrospective analysis. Mammographic microcalcifications were divided into four categories, "linear branching", "coarse granular", "fine granular" or "no microcalcification". Independently, pathology specimens were assigned to poorly, intermediately and well differentiated categories according to the consensus classification of DCIS introduced by the European Organisation for the Research and Treatment of Cancer. Two patients had no microcalcifications. 25 (53%) of the remaining 47 patients had "linear branching" microcalcifications, 10 (21%) had "coarse granular" and 12 (25.5%) had "fine granular" microcalcifications. 19 patients (40%) had poorly differentiated, 23 (49%) intermediately differentiated and 5 (11%) well differentiated subtypes of DCIS. 14 (56%) of the 25 patients with "linear branching" microcalcifications had poorly differentiated DCIS, 10 (40%) had intermediately differentiated and 1 (4%) had well differentiated DCIS. 3 (30%) of 10 patients with "coarse granular" microcalcifications had poorly differentiated DCIS, 5 (50%) had intermediately differentiated and 2 (20%) had well differentiated DCIS. 2 (17%) of 12 patients with "fine granular" microcalcifications had poorly differentiated DCIS, 8 (67%) had intermediately differentiated and 2 (17%) had well differentiated DCIS. These findings were not statistically significant. In conclusion, "linear branching" microcalcifications tended to be associated with higher pathological grading. However, correlation was poor and there was considerable overlap between categories. Histological type of DCIS cannot be predicted prospectively on mammographic appearances.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Arch SurgHome page
R. G. Zunzunegui, M. A. Chung, J. Oruwari, D. Golding, D. J. Marchant, and B. Cady
Casting-Type Calcifications With Invasion and High-Grade Ductal Carcinoma In Situ: A More Aggressive Disease?
Arch Surg, May 1, 2003; 138(5): 537 - 540.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING  ALL BIR JOURNALS 
Copyright © 2000 by the British Institute of Radiology.