BJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Williams, J. R.
Right arrow Articles by Montgomery, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Williams, J. R.
Right arrow Articles by Montgomery, A.

The British Journal of Radiology, Vol 73, Issue 873 1002-1006, Copyright © 2000 by British Institute of Radiology


ARTICLES

Measurement of dose in panoramic dental radiology

JR Williams and A Montgomery
Department of Medical Physics and Medical Engineering, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK.

The National Radiological Protection Board (NRPB) has recommended the introduction of dose-width product (DWP) for the measurement of patient dose in panoramic dental radiology and has proposed a reference level of 65 mGy mm for adult exposures. This paper describes a method for measuring DWP and dose-area product (DAP) using thermoluminescent dosemeters (TLDs). The technique was used on 16 sets with a range of exposure settings. The mean value of DWP was 14% higher than the mean value reported from a survey by the NRPB. This difference is most likely to be caused by systematic variations due to measurement method. The average DAP for a standard adult examination was shown to be 11.3 cGy cm2. Data are presented so that the DAP can be derived from the exposure factors (tube current and operating potential) and beam area. Based on published data for effective dose, it is estimated that the DAP to effective dose conversion factor is approximately 0.06 mSv(Gy cm2)-1. The average DAP value (11.3 cGy cm2) can be compared with the average value for intraoral radiography (9.3 cGy cm2) based on the NRPB survey of entrance surface doses assuming 6 cm circular collimation.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Radiat Prot DosimetryHome page
H. K. Looe, F. Eenboom, N. Chofor, A. Pfaffenberger, M. Steinhoff, A. Ruhmann, A. Poplawski, K. Willborn, and B. Poppe
Conversion coefficients for the estimation of effective doses in intraoral and panoramic dental radiology from dose-area product values
Radiat Prot Dosimetry, September 1, 2008; 131(3): 365 - 373.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
F. A. Mettler Jr, W. Huda, T. T. Yoshizumi, and M. Mahesh
Effective Doses in Radiology and Diagnostic Nuclear Medicine: A Catalog
Radiology, July 1, 2008; 248(1): 254 - 263.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Radiat Prot DosimetryHome page
C. J. Martin
RADIATION DOSIMETRY FOR DIAGNOSTIC MEDICAL EXPOSURES
Radiat Prot Dosimetry, March 28, 2008; (2008) ncm495v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Dentomaxillofac RadiolHome page
S Lofthag-Hansen, A Thilander-Klang, A Ekestubbe, E Helmrot, and K Grondahl
Calculating effective dose on a cone beam computed tomography device: 3D Accuitomo and 3D Accuitomo FPD
Dentomaxillofac. Radiol., February 1, 2008; 37(2): 72 - 79.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Dentomaxillofac RadiolHome page
S. Connor, T Arscott, J Berry, L Greene, and R O'Gorman
Precision and accuracy of low-dose CT protocols in the evaluation of skull landmarks
Dentomaxillofac. Radiol., July 1, 2007; 36(5): 270 - 276.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Radiat Prot DosimetryHome page
B. Poppe, H. K. Looe, A. Pfaffenberger, N. Chofor, F. Eenboom, M. Sering, A. Ruhmann, A. Poplawski, and K. Willborn
Dose-area product measurements in panoramic dental radiology
Radiat Prot Dosimetry, January 1, 2007; 123(1): 131 - 134.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
P Doyle, C J Martin, and J Robertson
Techniques for measurement of dose width product in panoramic dental radiography
Br. J. Radiol., February 1, 2006; 79(938): 142 - 147.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Radiat Prot DosimetryHome page
E. Helmrot and G. Alm Carlsson
Measurement of radiation dose in dental radiology
Radiat Prot Dosimetry, May 17, 2005; 114(1-3): 168 - 171.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Dentomaxillofac RadiolHome page
F Gijbels, R Jacobs, R Bogaerts, D Debaveye, S Verlinden, and G Sanderink
Dosimetry of digital panoramic imaging. Part I: patient exposure
Dentomaxillofac. Radiol., May 1, 2005; 34(3): 145 - 149.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Radiat Prot DosimetryHome page
C. E. Tierris, E. N. Yakoumakis, G. N. Bramis, and E. Georgiou
Dose area product reference levels in dental panoramic radiology
Radiat Prot Dosimetry, October 11, 2004; 111(3): 283 - 287.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Dentomaxillofac RadiolHome page
A Aroua, I Buchillier-Decka, K Dula, Y Nedjadi, M Perrier, J-P Vader, and J-F Valley
Radiation exposure in dental radiology: a 1998 nationwide survey in Switzerland
Dentomaxillofac. Radiol., July 1, 2004; 33(4): 211 - 219.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
P Isoardi and R Ropolo
Measurement of dose-width product in panoramic dental radiology
Br. J. Radiol., February 1, 2003; 76(902): 129 - 131.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING  ALL BIR JOURNALS 
Copyright © 2000 by the British Institute of Radiology.