| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
The British Journal of Radiology, Vol 73, Issue 870 641-649, Copyright © 2000 by British Institute of Radiology
ARTICLES |
Y Baorong, HM Kramer, HJ Selbach and B Lange
Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt, Braunschweig, Germany.
In diagnostic radiology the practical peak voltage was initially derived by postulating that, for a given combination of X-ray tube and contrast geometry, a constant X-ray tube voltage should produce the same low level contrast as an arbitrarily pulsating X-ray tube voltage. It has been shown previously that the practical peak voltage can be properly defined as a weighted average of the X-ray tube voltage. Up to now the concept of practical peak voltage was based entirely on the results of calculations. The present paper describes the experimental investigations for measuring and comparing the contrast-equivalent X-ray tube voltage and practical peak voltage derived from an invasive measurement of the time-dependent X-ray tube voltage. Within the experimental uncertainties, the results demonstrate the mutual equivalence of the practical peak voltage and the contrast-equivalent X-ray tube voltage.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
H-M KRAMER and H-J SELBACH Extension of the range of definition of the practical peak voltage up to 300 kV Br. J. Radiol., September 1, 2008; 81(969): 693 - 698. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
REFERENCES J. ICRU, December 1, 2005; 5(2): 103 - 113. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F J Ramirez-Jimenez, R Lopez-Callejas, J S Benitez-Read, and J O Pacheco-Sotelo Considerations on the measurement of practical peak voltage in diagnostic radiology Br. J. Radiol., September 1, 2004; 77(921): 745 - 750. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. M. Bernhardt, U. Rapp-Bernhardt, H. Lenzen, F. W. Roehl, S. Diederich, K. Papke, K. Ludwig, and W. Heindel Low-Voltage Digital Selenium Radiography: Detection of Simulated Interstitial Lung Disease, Nodules, and Catheters--A Phantom Study Radiology, September 1, 2004; 232(3): 693 - 700. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| BJR | DMFR | IMAGING | ALL BIR JOURNALS |