BJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ellis, S. M.
Right arrow Articles by Sidhu, P. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ellis, S. M.
Right arrow Articles by Sidhu, P. S.

The British Journal of Radiology, Vol 73, Issue 870 595-600, Copyright © 2000 by British Institute of Radiology


ARTICLES

Granularity of the carotid artery intima-medial layer: reproducibility of quantification by a computer-based program

SM Ellis and PS Sidhu
Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Kings College Hospital, Denmark Hill, London, UK.

Ultrasound of the carotid artery identifies the hypoechoic intima-medial layer (IML). Increased granularity of the IML has been associated with early atherosclerosis. The aim of the study was to assess the reproducibility and observer agreement of a computer-based program measure of IML granularity. Ten healthy adult volunteers (median age 32 years, range 18-34 years) were examined twice, 2 weeks apart, with a 7 MHz linear transducer using standardized imaging settings, by two observers. Images of both common carotid arteries were digitized and analysed on a customized computer program. The ratio (averaged over a 1 cm length of arterial wall) of the lowest pixel brightness in the IML to the maximum pixel brightness in the intima-medial interface was determined. Overall mean intima-medial reflectivity (IMR) indices for the two observers were 0.761 +/- 0.101 and 0.707 +/- 0.103, with single determination standard deviation values of 0.090 and 0.073, respectively. For interobserver calculations, the overall mean IMR index for both sessions was 0.734 +/- 0.107, with a single determination standard deviation of 0.067. Comparison with the intima-medial thickness (IMT) showed an inverse correlation (r = -0.72). This method of quantifying the reflectivity of the IML demonstrates good reproducibility in subjects with normal IMT measurements. The technique may be of value in identifying subjects at high risk of atherosclerosis but with IMT still within the normal range.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING  ALL BIR JOURNALS 
Copyright © 2000 by the British Institute of Radiology.