BJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Johnston, D. A.
Right arrow Articles by Brennan, P. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Johnston, D. A.
Right arrow Articles by Brennan, P. C.

The British Journal of Radiology, Vol 73, Issue 868 396-402, Copyright © 2000 by British Institute of Radiology


ARTICLES

Reference dose levels for patients undergoing common diagnostic X-ray examinations in Irish hospitals

DA Johnston and PC Brennan
School of Diagnostic Imaging, University College Dublin, Ireland.

Wide variations in patient dose for the same type of X-ray examination have been evident from various international dose surveys. Reference dose levels provide a framework to reduce this variability and aid in the optimization of radiation protection. The aim of this study was to establish, for the first time, a baseline for national reference dose levels in Ireland for four of the most common X-ray examinations: chest, abdomen, pelvis and lumbar spine. Measurements of entrance surface dose using thermoluminescent dosemeters (TLDs) for these four X-ray examinations were performed on 10 patients in each of 16 randomly selected hospitals. This represented 42% of Irish hospitals applicable to this study. Results have shown wide variation of mean hospital doses, from a factor of 3 for an anteroposterior lumbar spine to a factor of 23 for the chest X-ray. The difference between maximum and minimum individual patient dose values varied up to a factor of 75. Reasons for these dose variations were complex but, in general, low tube potential, high mAs and low filtration were associated with high-dose hospitals. This study also demonstrated lower reference dose levels of up to 40% when compared with those established by the UK and the Commission of the European Communities for four out of six projections. Only the chest X-ray exhibited a similar reference level to those established elsewhere. This emphasizes the importance of each country establishing its own reference dose levels that are appropriate to their own radiographic techniques and practices in order to optimize patient protection.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Radiat Prot DosimetryHome page
L. Lanca, A. Silva, E. Alves, F. Serranheira, and M. Correia
EVALUATION OF EXPOSURE PARAMETERS IN PLAIN RADIOGRAPHY: A COMPARATIVE STUDY WITH EUROPEAN GUIDELINES
Radiat Prot Dosimetry, April 22, 2008; (2008) ncn144v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Radiat Prot DosimetryHome page
M. T. Bahreyni Toosi and M. Asadinezhad
LOCAL DIAGNOSTIC REFERENCE LEVELS FOR SOME COMMON DIAGNOSTIC X-RAY EXAMINATIONS IN TEHRAN COUNTY OF IRAN
Radiat Prot Dosimetry, June 19, 2007; (2007) ncm175v2.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
radtechHome page
E. SEERAM and P. C. BRENNAN
Diagnostic Reference Levels In Radiology.
Radiol. Technol., May 1, 2006; 77(5): 373 - 384.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Radiat Prot DosimetryHome page
O. Ciraj, S. Markovic, and D. Kosutic
First results on patient dose measurements from conventional diagnostic radiology procedures in Serbia and Montenegro
Radiat Prot Dosimetry, April 28, 2005; 113(3): 330 - 335.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Radiat Prot DosimetryHome page
G. Compagnone, L. Pagan, and C. Bergamini
Local diagnostic reference levels in standard X-ray examinations
Radiat Prot Dosimetry, April 18, 2005; 113(1): 54 - 63.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Radiat Prot DosimetryHome page
P. C. Brennan, S. McDonnell, and D. O'Leary
Increasing film-focus distance (ffd) reduces radiation dose for x-ray examinations
Radiat Prot Dosimetry, February 1, 2004; 108(3): 263 - 268.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Radiat Prot DosimetryHome page
Y. Grondin, K. Matthews, M. McEntee, L. Rainford, M. Casey, M. Tonra, E. Al-Qattan, T. McCrudden, M. Foley, and P. C. Brennan
Dose-reducing strategies in combination offers substantial potential benefits to females requiring X-ray examination
Radiat Prot Dosimetry, January 15, 2004; 108(2): 123 - 132.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
E M Carroll and P C Brennan
Radiation doses for barium enema and barium meal examinations in Ireland: potential diagnostic reference levels
Br. J. Radiol., June 1, 2003; 76(906): 393 - 397.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
E McCarthy and P C Brennan
Viewing conditions for diagnostic images in three major Dublin hospitals: a comparison with WHO and CEC recommendations
Br. J. Radiol., February 1, 2003; 76(902): 94 - 97.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
P C Brennan and D Johnston
Irish X-ray departments demonstrate varying levels of adherence to European guidelines on good radiographic technique
Br. J. Radiol., March 1, 2002; 75(891): 243 - 248.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ImagingHome page
J V Cook
Radiation protection and quality assurance in paediatric radiology
Imaging, December 1, 2001; 13(4): 229 - 238.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING  ALL BIR JOURNALS 
Copyright © 2000 by the British Institute of Radiology.