The British Journal of Radiology, Vol 73, Issue 868 384-395, Copyright © 2000 by British Institute of Radiology

ARTICLES

Quality criteria implementation for brain and lumbar spine CT examinations

A Calzado, R Rodriguez and A Munoz
Departamento de Radiologia, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Complutense, Madrid, Spain.

A study was undertaken to implement the quality criteria proposed by the European Commission for brain general and lumbar spine (disc herniation) CT examinations. The proposed criteria were evaluated for samples including 93 brain and 86 lumbar spine CT examinations, with special emphasis on the diagnostic and radiation dose requirements. The extent to which the image criteria had been achieved was evaluated after two independent observers had each read the images twice. Dose measurements were conducted in parallel to estimate the proposed dose quantities needed to obtain the images. For brain examinations, we found that a group of image criteria were largely met, and met uniformly in all sites. One criterion (1.2.5) was frequently fulfilled but had intermediate values for two sites; the remaining criteria were fulfilled to different extents, although for criteria 1.2.1 and 1.2.2, scores were lower than 50% and 70%, respectively. The mean percentage image quality score had values between 57% and 78%, with variation coefficients in the range 30-68%. Mean values of the dose quantities were in the ranges 44-74 mGy for weighted CT dose index (CTDIw), 497-1018 mGy cm for dose-length product (DLP) and 1.1-2.2 mSv for effective dose (E). CTDIw and DLP were not correlated because of significant variations in the scanned length, whereas DLP and E were strongly correlated. A weak relationship between image quality score and DLP was found for the sample as a whole. For lumbar spine examinations, none of the critical reproduction image criteria was systematically achieved. One group of criteria (1.2.7, 1.2.8 and 1.2.9) was fulfilled to a large extent in many departments, but fulfilment of the remainder varied widely. The mean score fluctuated in the range 39-88%, with three groups of differences: low (39-51%), intermediate (67-71%) and high (85-88%). Mean values of the CTDIw varied between sites in the range 27-48 mGy. Mean DLP values varied between 188 mGy cm and 333 mGy cm, and the mean effective dose ranged between 3 mSv and 5 mSv. There were significant differences in effective dose between men and women. By sites, there was no relationship between DLP and mean score, with the highest image score associated with intermediate dose values. The percentage disagreement among the observers about a given criterion ranged between 2% and 22% for brain, and between 3% and 46% for lumbar spine.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				L M Moran, R Rodriguez, A Calzado, A Turrero, A Arenas, A Cuevas, B Garcia-Castano, N Gomez, and P Moran Image quality and dose evaluation in spiral chest CT examinations of patients with lung carcinoma Br. J. Radiol., October 1, 2004; 77(922): 839 - 846. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M T Crawley, A Booth, and A Wainwright A practical approach to the first iteration in the optimization of radiation dose and image quality in CT: estimates of the collective dose savings achieved Br. J. Radiol., July 1, 2001; 74(883): 607 - 614. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]