BJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Meeson, S.
Right arrow Articles by Cooke, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Meeson, S.
Right arrow Articles by Cooke, J.

The British Journal of Radiology, Vol 73, Issue 868 370-375, Copyright © 2000 by British Institute of Radiology


ARTICLES

Skin edge perception in mammograms: a comparison of two film-screen combinations

S Meeson, KC Young and J Cooke
Department of Medical Physics, Royal Surrey County Hospital, Guildford, UK.

The entire skin edge is not always seen on mammograms. The importance of demonstrating the full extent of the breast on a mammogram is uncertain, but there are implications for optimizing film design and use. The new Agfa HDR film has been designed to improve visualization of the skin edge without compromising overall contrast. A quantitative and qualitative comparison between Agfa HDR and the Fuji UMMA film has been performed. A total of 216 mammograms from 54 symptomatic women were analysed. For each view on each woman, one breast was imaged using Fuji UMMA film and the other using Agfa HDR film. The target density achieved on quality control films of PMMA blocks was 1.70 +/- 0.10 for both film types. A radiologist graded the skin edges of all the films as visible, just visible or dark. Measurements were made of the optical densities in the skin edge region and on the fully exposed black part of the film, adjacent to the skin line. 70% of the HDR films had visible skin edges compared with 43% of the UMMA films. 2% of the HDR films had dark skin edges compared with 26% of the UMMA films. Optical densities at the skin edge were broadly similar for the two films and in the range 3.6 +/- 0.3. However, the density of the black part of the Agfa film was about 0.5 higher than with the Fuji film and it appears that this was the main reason the skin edge region was better visualized with the Agfa film.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
S Meeson, K C Young, M G Wallis, J Cooke, A Cummin, and M L Ramsdale
Image features of true positive and false negative cancers in screening mammograms
Br. J. Radiol., January 1, 2003; 76(901): 13 - 21.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
L Costaridou, P Sakellaropoulos, A P Stefanoyiannis, E Ungureanu, and G Panayiotakis
Quantifying image quality at breast periphery vs mammary gland in mammography using wavelet analysis
Br. J. Radiol., October 1, 2001; 74(886): 913 - 919.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
S Meeson, K C Young, A Rust, M G Wallis, J Cooke, and M L Ramsdale
Implications of using high contrast mammography X-ray film-screen combinations
Br. J. Radiol., September 1, 2001; 74(885): 825 - 835.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING  ALL BIR JOURNALS 
Copyright © 2000 by the British Institute of Radiology.