BJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Robinson, P. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Robinson, P. J.

The British Journal of Radiology, Vol 73, Issue 867 234-241, Copyright © 2000 by British Institute of Radiology


ARTICLES

Imaging liver metastases: current limitations and future prospects

PJ Robinson
Clinical Radiology Department, St. James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK.

The diagnosis of liver metastasis relies on imaging. The sensitivity of ultrasound, CT and magnetic resonance techniques for detecting liver metastases can only be assessed in comparison with surgical inspection, intraoperative ultrasound and pathological examination, all methods that are of uncertain accuracy in detecting very small lesions. With current imaging technology, we should detect virtually all liver metastases 2 cm or larger in size, and most of those 1-2 cm in size. Even with optimum imaging, at present we detect only about one-half of metastatic nodules smaller than 1 cm in patients undergoing liver resection and pathological correlation. Improvements in the earlier detection of metastases will probably require a fundamentally different approach from that of conventional anatomical methods. Micrometastases produce alterations in blood flow that may be recognized by radionuclide or Doppler perfusion methods.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
J H ZHOU, A H LI, L H CAO, H H JIANG, L Z LIU, X Q PEI, and F HAN
Haemodynamic parameters of the hepatic artery and vein can detect liver metastases: assessment using contrast-enhanced ultrasound
Br. J. Radiol., February 1, 2008; 81(962): 113 - 119.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
E. Leen, P. Ceccotti, C. Kalogeropoulou, W. J. Angerson, S. J. Moug, and P. G. Horgan
Prospective multicenter trial evaluating a novel method of characterizing focal liver lesions using contrast-enhanced sonography.
Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2006; 186(6): 1551 - 1559.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
C Harvey and M Blomley
Imaging investigation of liver haemodynamics in patients at risk for hepatic metastatic disease
Br. J. Radiol., February 1, 2005; 78(926): 103 - 104.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
The OncologistHome page
D. V. Sahani and S. P. Kalva
Imaging the Liver
Oncologist, July 1, 2004; 9(4): 385 - 397.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
M A Fuentes, C J Keith, M Griffiths, G Durbridge, and K A Miles
Hepatic haemodynamics: interrelationships between contrast enhancement and perfusion on CT and Doppler perfusion indices
Br. J. Radiol., January 1, 2002; 75(889): 17 - 23.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
F. Forsberg, C. W. Piccoli, J.-B. Liu, N. M. Rawool, D. A. Merton, D. G. Mitchell, and B. B. Goldberg
Hepatic Tumor Detection: MR Imaging and Conventional US versus Pulse-Inversion Harmonic US of NC100100 during Its Reticuloendothelial System-Specific Phase
Radiology, March 1, 2002; 222(3): 824 - 829.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING  ALL BIR JOURNALS 
Copyright © 2000 by the British Institute of Radiology.