BJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Clark, A. L.
Right arrow Articles by McArthur, J. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Clark, A. L.
Right arrow Articles by McArthur, J. D.

The British Journal of Radiology, Vol 73, Issue 866 184-189, Copyright © 2000 by British Institute of Radiology


ARTICLES

Factors affecting patient radiation exposure during routine coronary angiography in a tertiary referral centre

AL Clark, AG Brennan, LJ Robertson and JD McArthur
Department of Cardiology, Western Infirmary, Glasgow, UK.

Cardiac catheterization is carried out by an increasing number of operators from district hospitals as well as tertiary referral centres. Procedures are not standardized and are at the discretion of individual operators. The purpose of this study was to describe the pattern of patient radiation dose and screening times associated with diagnostic cardiac catheterization, and explore determinants of radiation dose to patients and staff. Data were collected from 1337 diagnostic procedures carried out in two cardiac catheterization laboratories from January to June 1998. Screening time and radiation dose measured by dose-area product (DAP) meter were recorded. Status of the operator and type of investigation were determined. 22 operators had performed at least 15 left ventriculograms with coronary angiography (total 944 procedures). The average (+/- SD) was 40 (+/- 22) per operator. Screening times for individual operators varied from 2.0 (+/- 1.3) min to 5.0 (+/- 4.3) min with no relationship between time and number of cases. Consultants and visiting physicians had longer screening times and greater patient DAP readings. In comparison with 115 cases of coronary angiography alone, left ventriculography increased DAP reading from 14.24 (+/- 11.7) Gy cm2 to 20.26 (+/- 0.47) Gy cm2 (p < 0.0001). In 106 cases of coronary artery bypass graft angiography, an aortogram (n = 53) did not add significantly to radiation dose or screening time. A right heart catheter added approximately 5 min to screening time (9.13 (+/- 0.63) min with right heart (n = 83) vs 3.96 (+/- 0.12) min without right heart (n = 1234)), but did not affect radiation dose significantly. There is a wide range of screening times and radiation doses related to diagnostic cardiac catheterization. Visiting and consultant staff use greater radiation doses. Left ventriculography adds significantly to patients' radiation exposure. Aortography does not add significantly to radiation dose in cases of graft angiography.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
O W E Morrish and K E Goldstone
An investigation into patient and staff doses from X-ray angiography during coronary interventional procedures
Br. J. Radiol., January 1, 2008; 81(961): 35 - 45.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Radiat Prot DosimetryHome page
A. Peterzol, E. Quai, R. Padovani, G. Bernardi, C. J. Kotre, and A. Dowling
Reference levels in PTCA as a function of procedure complexity
Radiat Prot Dosimetry, December 1, 2005; 117(1-3): 54 - 58.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Radiat Prot DosimetryHome page
A. Trianni, G. Chizzola, H. Toh, E. Quai, E. Cragnolini, G. Bernardi, A. Proclemer, and R. Padovani
Patient skin dosimetry in haemodynamic and electrophysiology interventional cardiology
Radiat Prot Dosimetry, December 1, 2005; 117(1-3): 241 - 246.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
V Tsapaki, S Kottou, E Vano, K Faulkner, J Giannouleas, R Padovani, E Kyrozi, M Koutelou, E Vardalaki, and V Neofotistou
Patient dose values in a dedicated Greek cardiac centre
Br. J. Radiol., October 1, 2003; 76(910): 726 - 730.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
E Kuon, J Birkel, M Schmitt, and J B Dahm
Radiation exposure benefit of a lead cap in invasive cardiology
Heart, October 1, 2003; 89(10): 1205 - 1210.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
H. K. Pannu, T. G. Flohr, F. M. Corl, and E. K. Fishman
Current Concepts in Multi-Detector Row CT Evaluation of the Coronary Arteries: Principles, Techniques, and Anatomy
RadioGraphics, October 1, 2003; 23(90001): S111 - 125.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
F Larrazet, A Dibie, F Philippe, R Palau, R Klausz, and F Laborde
Factors influencing fluoroscopy time and dose-area product values during ad hoc one-vessel percutaneous coronary angioplasty
Br. J. Radiol., July 1, 2003; 76(907): 473 - 477.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
E Kuon, C Glaser, and J B Dahm
Effective techniques for reduction of radiation dosage to patients undergoing invasive cardiac procedures
Br. J. Radiol., June 1, 2003; 76(906): 406 - 413.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
E Kuon, J B Dahm, M Schmitt, C Glaser, O Gefeller, and A Pfahlberg
Time of day influences patient radiation exposure from percutaneous cardiac interventions
Br. J. Radiol., March 1, 2003; 76(903): 189 - 191.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
W R Arthur, J Dhawan, M S Norell, A J Hunter, and A L Clark
Does cardiologist- or radiographer-operated fluoroscopy and image acquisition influence optimization of patient radiation exposure during routine coronary angiography?
Br. J. Radiol., September 1, 2002; 75(897): 748 - 753.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING  ALL BIR JOURNALS 
Copyright © 2000 by the British Institute of Radiology.