BJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sone, S.
Right arrow Articles by Honda, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sone, S.
Right arrow Articles by Honda, T.

The British Journal of Radiology, Vol 73, Issue 866 137-145, Copyright © 2000 by British Institute of Radiology


ARTICLES

Characteristics of small lung cancers invisible on conventional chest radiography and detected by population based screening using spiral CT

S Sone, F Li, ZG Yang, S Takashima, Y Maruyama, M Hasegawa, JC Wang, S Kawakami and T Honda
Department of Radiology, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Nagano, Japan.

Conventional chest radiography (CXR) is a poor diagnostic tool for detecting lung cancers at a surgically curable stage. To determine the visibility of peripheral small lung cancers on CXR, we retrospectively examined the usefulness of CXR using a consecutive series of 44 cases detected on CT screening and later confirmed by histopathology. All cases had been detected by low dose CT during a population based screening trial for lung cancer. The control group consisted of 48 chest radiographs of normal subjects. Tumour diameters ranged from 6 mm to 45 mm, with 95% (42/44) < or = 20 mm, and 5% (2/44) > 20 mm. CXR failed to detect 77% (34/44) of all cancers, including 79% (33/42) < or = 20 mm and 50% (1/2) > 20 mm. Of the 42 lung cancers < or = 20 mm, 74% (31/42) were located in the well penetrated lung zones and 71% (22/31) of these were missed on CXR. 26% (11/42) were concealed by hilar vessels, mediastinum, heart or diaphragm, and all (11/11) of these were missed on CXR. 93% (39/42) of the lung cancers < or = 20 mm were adenocarcinomas and 79% (31/39) of these were missed on CXR. 7% (3/42) were epidermoid carcinomas or small cell carcinomas and 66% (2/3) of these were missed on CXR. The overall accuracy of interpretation on CXR for lung cancers was 61%, sensitivity was 23% and specificity 96%. Although there was an association between presence of lung cancer and positive reading of CXR (chi 2 test of association, p < 0.05), the percentage of positive readings was only 23%. Thus, CXR was poor at visualizing CT detectable lung cancers of < or = 20 mm diameter, which are usually of very low density, and cannot be relied upon for detection of surgically curable small lung cancer.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
M Bellomi, G Veronesi, C Rampinelli, S Ferretti, E De Fiori, and P Maisonneuve
Evolution of lung nodules <=5 mm detected with low-dose CT in asymptomatic smokers
Br. J. Radiol., September 1, 2007; 80(957): 708 - 712.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ThoraxHome page
C. Black, R. de Verteuil, S. Walker, J. Ayres, A. Boland, A. Bagust, and N. Waugh
Population screening for lung cancer using computed tomography, is there evidence of clinical effectiveness? A systematic review of the literature
Thorax, February 1, 2007; 62(2): 131 - 138.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
The OncologistHome page
M. B. Lobrano
Partnerships in Oncology and Radiology: The Role of Radiology in the Detection, Staging, and Follow-up of Lung Cancer
Oncologist, July 1, 2006; 11(7): 774 - 779.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
K. Awai, K. Murao, A. Ozawa, Y. Nakayama, T. Nakaura, D. Liu, K. Kawanaka, Y. Funama, S. Morishita, and Y. Yamashita
Pulmonary Nodules: Estimation of Malignancy at Thin-Section Helical CT--Effect of Computer-aided Diagnosis on Performance of Radiologists
Radiology, April 1, 2006; 239(1): 276 - 284.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
K Ono, T Yoshitake, K Akahane, Y Yamada, T Maeda, M Kai, and T Kusama
Comparison of a digital flat-panel versus screen-film, photofluorography and storage-phosphor systems by detection of simulated lung adenocarcinoma lesions using hard copy images
Br. J. Radiol., October 1, 2005; 78(934): 922 - 927.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
S. G. Spiro and G. A. Silvestri
One Hundred Years of Lung Cancer
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., September 1, 2005; 172(5): 523 - 529.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
J. R. Jett
Limitations of Screening for Lung Cancer with Low-Dose Spiral Computed Tomography
Clin. Cancer Res., July 1, 2005; 11(13): 4988s - 4992s.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
W. D. Travis, K. Garg, W. A. Franklin, I. I. Wistuba, B. Sabloff, M. Noguchi, R. Kakinuma, M. Zakowski, M. Ginsberg, R. Padera, et al.
Evolving Concepts in the Pathology and Computed Tomography Imaging of Lung Adenocarcinoma and Bronchioloalveolar Carcinoma
J. Clin. Oncol., May 10, 2005; 23(14): 3279 - 3287.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
S. J. Swensen, J. R. Jett, T. E. Hartman, D. E. Midthun, S. J. Mandrekar, S. L. Hillman, A.-M. Sykes, G. L. Aughenbaugh, A. O. Bungum, and K. L. Allen
CT Screening for Lung Cancer: Five-year Prospective Experience
Radiology, April 1, 2005; 235(1): 259 - 265.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
B. E. Chapman, D. F. Yankelevitz, C. I. Henschke, and D. Gur
Lung Cancer Screening: Simulations of Effects of Imperfect Detection on Temporal Dynamics
Radiology, February 1, 2005; 234(2): 582 - 590.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
K Doi
Current status and future potential of computer-aided diagnosis in medical imaging
Br. J. Radiol., January 1, 2005; 78(suppl_1): S3 - s19.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
J. R. Jett and D. E. Midthun
Screening for Lung Cancer: Current Status and Future Directions: Thomas A. Neff Lecture
Chest, May 1, 2004; 125(5_suppl): 158S - 162S.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ThoraxHome page
R MacRedmond, P M Logan, M Lee, D Kenny, C Foley, and R W Costello
Screening for lung cancer using low dose CT scanning
Thorax, March 1, 2004; 59(3): 237 - 241.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
K. Awai, K. Murao, A. Ozawa, M. Komi, H. Hayakawa, S. Hori, and Y. Nishimura
Pulmonary Nodules at Chest CT: Effect of Computer-aided Diagnosis on Radiologists' Detection Performance
Radiology, February 1, 2004; 230(2): 347 - 352.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
A. McWilliams, J. Mayo, S. MacDonald, J. C. leRiche, B. Palcic, E. Szabo, and S. Lam
Lung Cancer Screening: A Different Paradigm
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., November 15, 2003; 168(10): 1167 - 1173.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
S. J Swensen
Computed tomography screening for cancer
BMJ, October 6, 2003; 327(7418): E207 - 207.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
B. J. Hillman
CT Screening: Who Benefits and Who Pays
Radiology, July 1, 2003; 228(1): 26 - 28.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
S. J. Swensen, J. R. Jett, T. E. Hartman, D. E. Midthun, J. A. Sloan, A.-M. Sykes, G. L. Aughenbaugh, and M. A. Clemens
Lung Cancer Screening with CT: Mayo Clinic Experience
Radiology, March 1, 2003; 226(3): 756 - 761.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
P. K. Shah, J. H. M. Austin, C. S. White, P. Patel, L. B. Haramati, G. D. N. Pearson, M. C. Shiau, and Y. M. Berkmen
Missed Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Radiographic Findings of Potentially Resectable Lesions Evident Only in Retrospect
Radiology, January 1, 2003; 226(1): 235 - 241.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
F. Li, S. Sone, H. Abe, H. MacMahon, S. G. Armato III, and K. Doi
Lung Cancers Missed at Low-Dose Helical CT Screening in a General Population: Comparison of Clinical, Histopathologic, and Imaging Findings
Radiology, December 1, 2002; 225(3): 673 - 683.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
S. J. Swensen
CT Screening for Lung Cancer
Am. J. Roentgenol., October 1, 2002; 179(4): 833 - 836.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
S. J. SWENSEN, J. R. JETT, J. A. SLOAN, D. E. MIDTHUN, T. E. HARTMAN, A.-M. SYKES, G. L. AUGHENBAUGH, F. E. ZINK, S. L. HILLMAN, G. R. NOETZEL, et al.
Screening for Lung Cancer with Low-Dose Spiral Computed Tomography
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., February 15, 2002; 165(4): 508 - 513.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Respir JHome page
R.J. van Klaveren, J.D.F. Habbema, J.H. Pedersen, H.J. de Koning, M. Oudkerk, and H.C. Hoogsteden
Lung cancer screening by low-dose spiral computed tomography
Eur. Respir. J., November 1, 2001; 18(5): 857 - 866.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Respir JHome page
C. Brambilla and S. Spiro
Highlights in lung cancer
Eur. Respir. J., October 1, 2001; 18(4): 617 - 618.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
Z.-G. Yang, S. Sone, S. Takashima, F. Li, T. Honda, Y. Maruyama, M. Hasegawa, and S. Kawakami
High-Resolution CT Analysis of Small Peripheral Lung Adenocarcinomas Revealed on Screening Helical CT
Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2001; 176(6): 1399 - 1407.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
J. R. Jett
Spiral Computed Tomography Screening for Lung Cancer Is Ready for Prime Time
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., March 15, 2001; 163(4): 812 - 813.
[Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING  ALL BIR JOURNALS 
Copyright © 2000 by the British Institute of Radiology.