BJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stacey, C.
Right arrow Articles by Rose, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Stacey, C.
Right arrow Articles by Rose, D.

The British Journal of Radiology, Vol 73, Issue 866 133-136, Copyright © 2000 by British Institute of Radiology

ARTICLES

HyCoSy--as good as claimed?

C Stacey, C Bown, A Manhire and D Rose
Department of Radiology, Nottingham City Hospital, UK.

Hysterosalpingo contrast sonography (HyCoSy) has been compared favourably in the literature with hysterosalpingography (HSG). It does not require ionizing radiation and demonstrates the uterus and ovaries. HyCoSy is reported as being a safe, well tolerated, quick and easy investigation of Fallopian tube patency. Over a 1-year period HyCoSy was performed by two operators on 118 consecutive women who were thought likely to have patent Fallopian tubes. The examinations were graded using a local scale to assess discomfort and were correlated with tubal patency. HSG was performed on 116 patients by the same operators and discomfort recorded. 15 patients underwent both examinations. The degree of pain or reaction was graded 0 (no pain) to 4 (maximum) according to a locally devised scale. Costs of the two examinations were estimated. 89 patients examined by HyCoSy were graded 0-2. However, 23 had severe protracted pain and/or vasovagal reactions with bradycardia and hypotension. Of these, seven required resuscitation owing to prolonged symptoms, requiring treatment with atropine. 19 of the 23 had bilaterally patent Fallopian tubes. Where subsequent HSG was performed, tubal occlusion was confirmed in 8 of 15 women. Other pathologies were noted in 29 of the HyCoSy patients and there were six technical failures. During the same period no severe adverse reactions occurred in 116 patients having HSG performed by the same operators. Three of the HSG examinations were technically unsuccessful. Discomfort following HyCoSy was much greater than that reported previously. Possible mechanisms are discussed but it does not appear to be related to tubal occlusion. Diagnostic accuracy, costs and discomfort compare unfavourably with HSG.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
ESHRE Capri Workshop Group
Diagnosis and management of the infertile couple: missing information
Hum. Reprod. Update, July 1, 2004; 10(4): 295 - 307.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING  ALL BIR JOURNALS 
Copyright © 2000 by the British Institute of Radiology.