BJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH

Published online before print March 30, 2009
British Journal of Radiology 2009, doi:10.1259/bjr/72852974

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Rapid PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by NGUYEN, N P
Right arrow Articles by SALLAH, S
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by NGUYEN, N P
Right arrow Articles by SALLAH, S
© 2009 The British Institute of Radiology

Full paper

Analysis of factors influencing aspiration risk following chemoradiation for oropharyngeal cancer

N P NGUYEN 1, C FRANK 2, C C MOLTZ 2, P VOS 3, H J SMITH 4, P D NGUYEN 5, T MARTINEZ 5, U KARLSSON 6, S DUTTA 7, C LEMANSKI 8, L M NGUYEN 9, BS , S SALLAH 10

1 Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, Greece
2 Speech Pathology, VA North Texas Health Care System, Dallas, TX, Greece
3 Biostatistics, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, Greece
4 Radiology, Greece
5 Radiation Oncology, VA North Texas Health Care System, Dallas, TX, Greece
6 Department of Radiation Oncology, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, Greece
7 Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, LA, Greece
8 Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Val D'Aurelle, Montpellier, France, Greece
9 School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA, Greece
10 Division of Hematology Research, Novonordisk, Athens, Greece


   Abstract

Our aim was to identify risk factors for aspiration following concurrent chemoradiation for oropharyngeal cancer. 46 patients with locally advanced oropharyngeal carcinoma underwent concurrent chemoradiation at our institution. All patients underwent modified barium swallow to assess dysphagia severity and to determine the need for continued tube feedings after treatment. Dysphagia severity was graded as 1–7. There were 5 Grade 2, 11 Grade 3, 5 Grade 4, 5 Grade 5, 10 Grade 6 and 10 Grade 7 scores. 25 patients (54%) developed aspiration (5 trace, 20 severe). The aspiration rate for T1–T2 and T3–T4 tumours was 31% and 67%, respectively (p = 0.03). There was no statistical difference in the aspiration rate between the base of the tongue and tonsillar carcinoma (p = 0.23). Despite anatomic organ preservation, most patients with locally advanced oropharyngeal carcinoma had moderate to severe dysphagia after chemoradiation. Patients with large tumours had a significant risk of developing aspiration following treatment.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
BJR DMFR IMAGING  ALL BIR JOURNALS 
Copyright © 2009 by the British Institute of Radiology.