BJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vijayakumar, S.
Right arrow Articles by Chen, G. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Vijayakumar, S.
Right arrow Articles by Chen, G. T.

The British Journal of Radiology, Vol 72, Issue 861 882-888, Copyright © 1999 by British Institute of Radiology

ARTICLES

In the radiotherapy of prostate cancer, technique determines the doses to the penile structures

S Vijayakumar, LC Myrianthopoulos, J Dabrowski, CA Pelizzari, J Rosengarten, A Nguyen, F Vaida and GT Chen
Department of Radiation and Cellular Oncology, Michael Reese/University of Chicago/University of Illinois Center for Radiation Therapy, USA.

For 11 consecutive prostate cancer patients undergoing three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) in our institution, penile structures (PNS) were outlined in CT images obtained for treatment planning purposes. Dose-volume histograms (DVHs) were compared in order to study dose-volume relations for three techniques: 4FLD, an axial coplanar, four-field box technique; 6FLD, a six-field coplanar technique; and 4NAX, a coplanar but non-axial, four-field technique. All three techniques delivered equal doses to the planning target volumes (PTV). Our statistical analyses strongly indicate that the three techniques can be ranked as 6FLD better than 4FLD (and 4FLD better than 4NAX) as far as irradiating PNS volume during treatment of prostate cancer (PC) is concerned. For each technique, there is a "spread" owing to differences in patient anatomy and/or target size, position, and extent, but each technique has a similar "profile" or "shape" distinct from other techniques. Whether irradiating smaller volumes of PNS will influence the sexual potency outcome remains to be demonstrated. However, PNS should be considered as another critical structure in addition to rectum, bladder and femoral heads in the radiotherapy (RT) of PC, especially in 3DCRT dose escalation studies. Sexual potency outcomes can be correlated to dose-volume relations in the future and this will help refine radiotherapy techniques further.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Br. J. Radiol.Home page
J Kao, J Turian, A Meyers, R J Hamilton, B Smith, S Vijayakumar, and A B Jani
Sparing of the penile bulb and proximal penile structures with intensity-modulated radiation therapy for prostate cancer
Br. J. Radiol., February 1, 2004; 77(914): 129 - 136.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING  ALL BIR JOURNALS 
Copyright © 1999 by the British Institute of Radiology.