BJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mooney, R.
Right arrow Articles by Thomas, P. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mooney, R.
Right arrow Articles by Thomas, P. S.

The British Journal of Radiology, Vol 71, Issue 848 852-860, Copyright © 1998 by British Institute of Radiology


ARTICLES

Dose reduction in a paediatric X-ray department following optimization of radiographic technique

R Mooney and PS Thomas
Northern Ireland Regional Medical Physics Agency, Forster Green Hospital, Belfast, UK.

A survey of radiation doses to children from diagnostic radiography has been carried out in a dedicated paediatric X-ray room. Entrance surface dose (ESD) and dose-area product (DAP) per radiograph were simultaneously measured with thermoluminescent dosemeters (TLDs) and a DAP meter to provide mean dose values for separate age ranges. Results of ESD and DAP were lower than the mean values from other UK studies for all ages and radiographs, except for the infant pelvis AP radiograph. Comparison of ESD and radiographic technique with CEC quality criteria highlighted a need for reduction of dose to infants and implied an increase in tube filtration might overcome the limitations of the room's three-phase, 12-pulse generator, allowing higher tube potentials to be used on infants. Additional tube filtration of 3 mmA1 was installed following assessment of dose reduction and image quality with test objects and phantoms, and confirmation from the paediatric radiologist that clinical image quality was not-significantly altered. The tube potential was increased from 50 to 56 kVp for the infant pelvis AP radiograph. The resulting ESD and effective dose fell by 51% and 38%, respectively. The CEC quality criteria have proved useful as a benchmark against which technique in X-ray departments can be compared, and as such are a useful tool for optimizing radiographic technique and reducing patient dose.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Radiat Prot DosimetryHome page
M. A. d. S. Lacerda, T. A. da Silva, and H. J. Khoury
Assessment of dosimetric quantities for patients undergoing X-ray examinations in a large public hospital in Brazil--a preliminary study
Radiat Prot Dosimetry, December 1, 2008; 132(1): 73 - 79.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Radiat Prot DosimetryHome page
L. Lanca, A. Silva, E. Alves, F. Serranheira, and M. Correia
EVALUATION OF EXPOSURE PARAMETERS IN PLAIN RADIOGRAPHY: A COMPARATIVE STUDY WITH EUROPEAN GUIDELINES
Radiat Prot Dosimetry, April 22, 2008; (2008) ncn144v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Radiat Prot DosimetryHome page
R. Borisova, Ch. Ingilizova, and J. Vassileva
Patient dosimetry in paediatric diagnostic radiology
Radiat Prot Dosimetry, March 1, 2008; 129(1-3): 155 - 159.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Radiat Prot DosimetryHome page
I. I. Suliman, N. Abbas, and F. I. Habbani
Entrance surface doses to patients undergoing selected diagnostic X-ray examinations in Sudan
Radiat Prot Dosimetry, February 1, 2007; 123(2): 209 - 214.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Radiat Prot DosimetryHome page
J. P. A. Azevedo, M. G. de Oliveira, C. J. Cunha, M. E. G. Valerio, and D. N. Souza
Dose evaluation in paediatric radiology and adult bone densitometry examinations
Radiat Prot Dosimetry, September 1, 2006; 120(1-4): 91 - 94.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Radiat Prot DosimetryHome page
J. Hansson, M. Bath, M. Hakansson, H. Grundin, E. Bjurklint, P. Orvestad, A. Kjellstrom, H. Bostrom, M. Jonsson, K. Jonsson, et al.
An optimisation strategy in a digital environment applied to neonatal chest imaging
Radiat Prot Dosimetry, May 17, 2005; 114(1-3): 278 - 285.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Radiat Prot DosimetryHome page
Y. Grondin, K. Matthews, M. McEntee, L. Rainford, M. Casey, M. Tonra, E. Al-Qattan, T. McCrudden, M. Foley, and P. C. Brennan
Dose-reducing strategies in combination offers substantial potential benefits to females requiring X-ray examination
Radiat Prot Dosimetry, January 15, 2004; 108(2): 123 - 132.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
A C Offiah and C M Hall
Evaluation of the Commission of the European Communities quality criteria for the paediatric lateral spine
Br. J. Radiol., December 1, 2003; 76(912): 885 - 890.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
P C Brennan and D Johnston
Irish X-ray departments demonstrate varying levels of adherence to European guidelines on good radiographic technique
Br. J. Radiol., March 1, 2002; 75(891): 243 - 248.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ImagingHome page
J V Cook
Radiation protection and quality assurance in paediatric radiology
Imaging, December 1, 2001; 13(4): 229 - 238.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
N F Jones, T W Palarm, and I S Negus
Neonatal chest and abdominal radiation dosimetry: a comparison of two radiographic techniques
Br. J. Radiol., October 1, 2001; 74(886): 920 - 925.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING  ALL BIR JOURNALS 
Copyright © 1998 by the British Institute of Radiology.