BJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bucchi, L.
Right arrow Articles by Amadori, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bucchi, L.
Right arrow Articles by Amadori, D.

The British Journal of Radiology, Vol 70, Issue 839 1174-1177, Copyright © 1997 by British Institute of Radiology

ARTICLES

Effect of routine mammography practice on tumour size of a registry-based series of breast cancer cases compared with those observed in a screening cohort

L Bucchi, A Piatesi, F Falcini, O Nanni and D Amadori
Romagna Cancer Registry, Luigi Pierantoni Hospital, Forli, Italy.

Routine mammography (MX) practice based on self-referral is considered not to be susceptible to monitoring at the population level. Invasive breast cancer cases notified to the Romagna Cancer Registry between 1989 and 1991 (total 654) were stratified by MX experience and were compared for the proportion of lesions greater than 2 cm in size (T2+) with cases observed in the study group of the Swedish Two Counties Screening Trial (TCST). Any MX more than 6 months prior to diagnosis was considered a previous routine examination. The proportion of cases registered in Romagna within 6-11 months of the most recent MX was quite similar to that shown by the interval cases of the TCST (50% vs 53%). T2+ cases registered in Romagna 12-23 months (27%) and 24-35 months (19%) after previous MX were similar in frequency to those detected at second and later screens in the TCST (22%). For longer intervals, the percentage of large tumours in the Romagna series increased, up to 45% among the cases registered more than 48 months since last MX (p < 0.0001). The whole group of cases with previous MX in Romagna and its counterpart in the TCST (i.e. interval cases + cases detected at second and later screens) had the same size distribution (35% vs 34%). The frequency of large tumours in the total series from Romagna was greater than in the total study group of the TCST (45% vs 36%, p < 0.0001). The difference was entirely accounted for by the cases with no previous MX.




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING  ALL BIR JOURNALS 
Copyright © 1997 by the British Institute of Radiology.