BJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wade, J. P.
Right arrow Articles by Goldstone, K. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wade, J. P.
Right arrow Articles by Goldstone, K. E.

The British Journal of Radiology, Vol 70, Issue 839 1146-1151, Copyright © 1997 by British Institute of Radiology


ARTICLES

CT standard protocols are of limited value in assessing actual patient dose

JP Wade, JC Weyman and KE Goldstone
East Anglian Regional Radiation Protection Service, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK.

In the last 10 years the use of computed tomography in radiodiagnosis has increased markedly and CT scanners are now present in most district general hospitals. Modern CT scanners are versatile in their operation and offer the operator a wide choice in exposure parameters which affect the doses received by the patients. As CT is a major contributor to medical radiation doses, the National Radiological Protection Board (NRPB) recommends that an estimate of typical patient dose should be made for commonly used local scanning protocols. A survey has been undertaken in the Anglia and Oxford region covering 12 CT scanners. Common procedures were chosen, concentrating on those most frequently carried out and giving higher effective doses. These included routine heads, routine chests, high resolution chests and abdomen/pelvis examinations. Questionnaires were sent out to each CT centre to collect data on standard protocols and to record the procedure used for five actual patients for each examination type thus enabling a comparison of the two methodologies. This study has shown that many examinations are tailored to the individual patient size and clinical indications, particularly in the chest/abdomen/pelvis. Thus, assessing doses based on collecting standard protocols may not give a true indication of the effective doses being received by particular patients.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
S J Yates, L C Pike, and K E Goldstone
Effect of multislice scanners on patient dose from routine CT examinations in East Anglia
Br. J. Radiol., June 1, 2004; 77(918): 472 - 478.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
P Aviles Lucas, I A Castellano, D R Dance, and E Vano Carruana
Analysis of surface dose variation in CT procedures
Br. J. Radiol., December 1, 2001; 74(888): 1128 - 1136.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
M T Crawley, A Booth, and A Wainwright
A practical approach to the first iteration in the optimization of radiation dose and image quality in CT: estimates of the collective dose savings achieved
Br. J. Radiol., July 1, 2001; 74(883): 607 - 614.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
M. Cohnen, H. Fischer, J. Hamacher, E. Lins, R. Kötter, and U. Mödder
CT of the Head by Use of Reduced Current and Kilovoltage: Relationship between Image Quality and Dose Reduction
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., October 1, 2000; 21(9): 1654 - 1660.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
S. Diederich, H. Lenzen, R. Windmann, Z. Puskas, T. M. Yelbuz, S. Henneken, T. Klaiber, M. Eameri, N. Roos, and P. E. Peters
Pulmonary Nodules: Experimental and Clinical Studies at Low-Dose CT
Radiology, October 1, 1999; 213(1): 289 - 298.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING  ALL BIR JOURNALS 
Copyright © 1997 by the British Institute of Radiology.