The British Journal of Radiology, Vol 70, Issue 839 1109-1111, Copyright © 1997 by British Institute of Radiology

ARTICLES

Clinicians' interpretation of the indeterminate ventilation-perfusion scan report

PG Kember, HA Euinton and SK Morcos
Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Northern General Hospital, Sheffield, UK.

Most patients with suspected pulmonary embolism are initially investigated by radio-nuclide ventilation-perfusion (VQ) scanning. Approximately 70% of VQ scans are "indeterminate". Further investigations should be considered in such patients in order to establish a definitive diagnosis. However, these investigations are rarely requested in patients with indeterminate scans in our institution. We therefore decided to review the casenotes of such patients to determine their subsequent management. Over a 9 month period, 131 (32%) out of a total of 413 consecutive VQ scans were reported as indeterminate. The casenotes of 111 of these patients (65 female, 46 male, mean age 65 years, range 17-91 years) were reviewed. 52 of the 111 patients (46%) were treated on clinical grounds without further investigation; 12 patients (11%) had further investigation; and in 39 of the cases (35%) the VQ scan report was misinterpreted. 20 (38%) of the 52 patients managed on clinical grounds were treated for pulmonary embolus with anticoagulation and 26 (50%) were not anticoagulated. Of the 12 patients who were investigated further, nine had lower limb Doppler ultrasound and three had contrast venography. No patients had pulmonary angiography. Of the 39 cases where the VQ report was misinterpreted, the result was misquoted in the casenotes of 37 (95%) as negative for PE and none of these patients were anticoagulated, and in two cases (5%) it was misquoted as positive for PE and anticoagulant therapy was instituted. The misunderstanding was observed in all clinical firms. Such misinterpretation may have significant implications, since 30-40% of patients with indeterminate scans may have had PE. Our findings suggest that clinicians need to be better informed of the significance of an indeterminate VQ scan result.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. E. Jones and C. Wittram The Indeterminate CT Pulmonary Angiogram: Imaging Characteristics and Patient Clinical Outcome Radiology, October 1, 2005; 237(1): 329 - 337. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. S. Wells, D. R. Anderson, M. Rodger, I. Stiell, J. F. Dreyer, D. Barnes, M. Forgie, G. Kovacs, J. Ward, and M. J. Kovacs Excluding Pulmonary Embolism at the Bedside without Diagnostic Imaging: Management of Patients with Suspected Pulmonary Embolism Presenting to the Emergency Department by Using a Simple Clinical Model and D-dimer Ann Intern Med, July 17, 2001; 135(2): 98 - 107. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G Saro, J F Campo, M J Hernández, M Anta, J M Olmos, J González-Macías, and J A Riancho Diagnostic approach to patients with suspected pulmonary embolism: a report from the real world Postgrad. Med. J., May 1, 1999; 75(883): 285 - 288. [Abstract] [Full Text]