| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
The British Journal of Radiology, Vol 70, Issue 838 1000-1003, Copyright © 1997 by British Institute of Radiology
ARTICLES |
CC Chan, TK Loke, JC Chan and SS Lo
Department of Diagnostic Radiology, United Christian Hospital, Kwun Tong, Kowloon, Hong Kong.
Oral regimens for bowel preparation before barium enema examination are routinely used because of their convenience and simplicity, rather than the traditional method of colonic wash-out. We performed a prospective study comparing the side-effects and efficacy of two commonly used oral bowel evacuants (Citromag and Golytely) for bowel preparation before barium enema examination in 102 patients. The side-effects associated with the agents were assessed by analysing a questionnaire completed by the patients. There was no significant difference in the side-effects between the two agents although more patients taking Golytely (45.5%) deemed its taste unacceptable than those taking Citromag (25.9%). The results of the bowel preparation were assessed by two independent radiologists giving scores on the amount of faecal residue and the quality of mucosal coating. The amount of faecal residue was less in the Golytely group (p < 0.05). The quality of mucosal coating by barium was also better in the Golytely group than the Citromag group (p < 0.05).
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| BJR | DMFR | IMAGING | ALL BIR JOURNALS |