BJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Peh, W. C.
Right arrow Articles by Low, L. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Peh, W. C.
Right arrow Articles by Low, L. C.

The British Journal of Radiology, Vol 70, Issue 837 891-896, Copyright © 1997 by British Institute of Radiology


ARTICLES

Ileoileocolic intussusception in children: diagnosis and significance

WC Peh, PL Khong, C Lam, KL Chan, H Saing, W Cheng, GH Mya, WW Lam, LL Leong and LC Low
Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Hong Kong, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong.

The ileoileocolic type of childhood intussusception is difficult to diagnose pre-operatively and is associated with increased morbidity. This study describes the clinical and imaging features of 10 consecutive ileoileocolic intussusceptions diagnosed ultrasonically in 10 patients over a 36 month period. Ultrasound-guided hydrostatic reduction using Hartmann's solution was attempted in all 10 patients. Clinical and imaging features were compared with those of 28 ileocolic intussusceptions in 25 patients diagnosed and treated using the same methods during the same period. Most of the clinical and plain radiographic features of the patients with the ileoileocolic and ileocolic types of intussusception were similar. The two types of intussusception had the classical doughnut or pseudokidney, or both, signs on pre-reduction ultrasound scans. During the reduction process, when surrounded by fluid within the caecal lumen, the ileoileocolic type of intussusception had a typical complex appearance due to frond-like loops of intussuscepted small bowel. This finding was present in all cases. The hydrostatic reduction rate was only 10% (1/10) for ileoileocolic intussusception, compared with 92.9% (26/28) for the ileocolic type. All unsuccessfully-reduced cases underwent surgery, with surgical confirmation of the intussusception type in all cases. Only one patient was found to have a lead point, caused by a Meckel's diverticulum. In conclusion, the diagnosis of ileoileocolic intussusception can be made pre-operatively and these patients require surgical management.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
N H Park, S I Park, C S Park, E J Lee, M S Kim, J A Ryu, and J M Bae
Ultrasonographic findings of small bowel intussusception, focusing on differentiation from ileocolic intussusception
Br. J. Radiol., October 1, 2007; 80(958): 798 - 802.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
P. L. Khong, W. C. G. Peh, C. H. L. Lam, K. L. Chan, W. Cheng, W. W. M. Lam, V. H. G. Ai, H. Saing, P. K. H. Tam, L. L. Y. Leong, et al.
Ultrasound-guided Hydrostatic Reduction of Childhood Intussusception: Technique and Demonstration
RadioGraphics, September 1, 2000; 20(5): e1 - e1.
[Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING  ALL BIR JOURNALS 
Copyright © 1997 by the British Institute of Radiology.