The British Journal of Radiology, Vol 70, Issue 836 798-804, Copyright © 1997 by British Institute of Radiology

ARTICLES

A comparison between the platelet activating properties of different contrast media used in radiology and MRI

M Laffan, P Dawson and RP Gooding
Department of Haematology, Royal Postgraduate Medical School, London, UK.

Previous studies have demonstrated that some intravascular radiographic contrast media (CM) used in angiography, especially non-ionic monomers, may cause platelet activation. This study was designed to elucidate which properties of the CM were responsible for this activity. Platelet activation engendered by CM was studied using flow cytometry to detect platelet degranulation (as CD62 expression) and fibrinogen binding. In order to elucidate the relevant characteristics of the CM responsible, contrast agents of differing structures, properties, formulations and osmolalities were studied; ionic and non-ionic, monomeric and dimeric. Gadolinium chelate MR enhancing agents and saline solutions of differing osmolalities were also investigated. Ionic dimeric sodium meglumine ioxaglate, non-ionic dimeric iodixanol and non-ionic dimeric iotrolan did not produce increased degranulation compared with saline controls. However, all agents produced a mild increase in bound fibrinogen. Experiments using saline solutions demonstrated that these effects are not attributable to the high osmolality of some CM. The broad comparison facilitated by this study shows that previous generalizations regarding platelet activation by CM, based on an ionic-non-ionic division, are not valid. We presume that some chemical structural property of the compounds is responsible and it is of note that the chemically distinct gadolinium chelates, gadolinium DTPA and gadolinium DTPA-BMA, also caused platelet activation to a similar degree. CD62 expression correlated with fibrinogen binding suggesting that at least one common pathway of platelet activation is involved.