BJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Blanchard, T. K.
Right arrow Articles by Hazleman, B. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Blanchard, T. K.
Right arrow Articles by Hazleman, B. L.

The British Journal of Radiology, Vol 70, Issue 836 786-790, Copyright © 1997 by British Institute of Radiology


ARTICLES

Magnetic resonance imaging or arthrography of the shoulder: which do patients prefer?

TK Blanchard, PW Bearcroft, AK Dixon, DJ Lomas, A Teale, CR Constant and BL Hazleman
Department of Radiology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK.

110 consecutive patients were asked about their degree of anxiety (SAI scores), pain (VAS scores) and preferences at various stages before and after imaging in order to determine whether patients with shoulder problems prefer MRI or shoulder arthrography. 88 patients underwent MRI, 42 arthrography and 19 both. Mean levels of anxiety were slightly higher for patients undergoing MRI than those having arthrography, but this difference was not statistically significant. There was a statistically significant (p < 0.03) reduction in anxiety after arthrography, but not following MRI. Pain scores fell for both patient groups while at rest during the imaging procedure compared with their pre-imaging baseline measurement. This was statistically significant (p < 0.03) for MRI, but not for arthrography. A significantly higher proportion (p < 0.001) of patients found MRI unpleasant or extremely unpleasant (20/77) compared with arthrography (3/41). Of the 25 patients who expressed a preference on the basis of past or current experience, 11 preferred MRI and 14 arthrography (NS). There was no significant difference in the proportion of patients who would not allow the test to be repeated (29/73 for MRI, 15/39 for arthrography): Although there were minor differences in both the anxiety and pain experienced by patients undergoing MRI and arthrography, this study did not reveal any firm preference for either investigation.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
W. Hollingworth
Radiology Cost and Outcomes Studies: Standard Practice and Emerging Methods
Am. J. Roentgenol., October 1, 2005; 185(4): 833 - 839.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
W. D. Middleton, W. T. Payne, S. A. Teefey, C. F. Hildebolt, D. A. Rubin, and K. Yamaguchi
Sonography and MRI of the Shoulder: Comparison of Patient Satisfaction
Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2004; 183(5): 1449 - 1452.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
C. A. Binkert, M. Zanetti, and J. Hodler
Patient's Assessment of Discomfort during MR Arthrography of the Shoulder
Radiology, December 1, 2001; 221(3): 775 - 778.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING  ALL BIR JOURNALS 
Copyright © 1997 by the British Institute of Radiology.