BJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sproule, M. W.
Right arrow Articles by Reid, A. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sproule, M. W.
Right arrow Articles by Reid, A. W.

The British Journal of Radiology, Vol 70, Issue 836 782-785, Copyright © 1997 by British Institute of Radiology


ARTICLES

The value of light reflection rheography as a screening tool for deep venous thrombosis

MW Sproule, DJ Alcorn and AW Reid
Department of Radiology, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, UK.

Deep venous thrombosis (DVT) is a common condition in which the clinical diagnosis is notoriously inaccurate. The diagnosis is usually made in the Radiology Department by either Doppler ultrasound or conventional venography. The high clinical suspicion for DVT and the availability of these imaging modalities places an ever increasing burden on radiology departments. Light reflection rheography (LRR) is a non-invasive technique for assessing venous disorders. It is easy and quick and can be performed at the bedside or in the Radiology Department. LRR was prospectively compared with conventional venography in 50 consecutive patients undergoing investigation for possible DVT. LRR was entirely normal in 24 patients and this was confirmed on venography in each case. In practice it was not always possible to differentiate between DVT and venous insufficiency in the 26 abnormal tracings but all 15 cases of venography-proven DVT were within this group. There were no false negative diagnoses of DVT. LRR is a simple and quick method of screening for DVT with significant cost saving implications. A normal tracing reliably excludes the diagnosis, whilst all abnormal tracings should undergo Doppler ultrasound or venography.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Emerg. Med. J.Home page
T Locker, S Goodacre, F Sampson, A Webster, and A J Sutton
Meta-analysis of plethysmography and rheography in the diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis.
Emerg. Med. J., August 1, 2006; 23(8): 630 - 635.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING  ALL BIR JOURNALS 
Copyright © 1997 by the British Institute of Radiology.