The British Journal of Radiology, Vol 70, Issue 835 691-696, Copyright © 1997 by British Institute of Radiology

ARTICLES

The combined use of ultrasound and densitometry in the prediction of vertebral fracture

C Cepollaro, S Gonnelli, C Pondrelli, S Martini, A Montagnani, S Rossi, L Gennari and C Gennari
Institute of Internal Medicine, University of Siena, Italy.

Measurement of ultrasonographic parameters provides information concerning not only bone density but also bone architecture. We investigated the usefulness of ultrasonographic parameters and bone mineral density for evaluating the probability of vertebral fracture. 397 postmenopausal women (59.1 +/- 6.0 years) with (n = 178) or without (n = 219) atraumatic vertebral fractures were studied. In all women, bone mineral density (BMD) of the lumbar spine was evaluated by dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and speed of sound (SOS); broadband ultrasound attenuation (BUA) and Stiffness in the calcaneus were evaluated by an Achilles unit (Lunar Corporation). Ultrasonographic parameters and BMD were compared by examining the magnitude of the odds ratios, to determine which produces the highest estimate of the probability of odds of fracture, and by examining widths of the respective confidence intervals (CI) to show which estimate of odd ratio is the most precise. The relative risk of vertebral fracture, after adjusting for potential confounders, was 3.5 (CI 2.6-4.8) for BUA; 4.5 (CI 3.2-6.2) for SOS; 5.8 (CI 4.0-8.4) for Stiffness and 7.5 (CI 4.8-11.5) for BMD. Ultrasound (US) parameters were still significant independent predictors of vertebral fracture, even after adjusting for BMD. The relative risk of fracture for a simultaneous decrease by 1 SD of BMD and by 1 SD of each ultrasound parameter was 17.3 (CI 9.4-39.6) for BMD and SOS; 18.3 (CI 8.4-30.6) for BMD and BUA and 22.1 (CI 8.9-52.7) for BMD and Stiffness. Our data suggest that US and BMD provide complementary information which can be combined to improve estimates of vertebral fracture risk.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. W Grabe, J. Cerulli, J. S Stroup, and M. P Kane Comparison of the Achilles Express Ultrasonometer with Central Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry Ann. Pharmacother., May 1, 2006; 40(5): 830 - 835. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. R. Krestan, S. Grampp, C. Henk, P. Peloschek, and H. Imhof Limited Diagnostic Agreement of Quantitative Sonography of the Radius and Phalanges with Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry of the Spine, Femur, and Radius for Diagnosis of Osteoporosis Am. J. Roentgenol., September 1, 2004; 183(3): 639 - 644. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. M DeHart and E. H Gonzalez Osteoporosis: Point-of-Care Testing Ann. Pharmacother., March 1, 2004; 38(3): 473 - 481. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. M. Lomoschitz, S. Grampp, C. B. Henk, K. F. Linnau, C. R. Kresta, H. Resch, and H. Imhof Comparison of Imaging-Guided and Non-Imaging-Guided Quantitative Sonography of the Calcaneus with Dual X-Ray Absorptiometry of the Spine and Femur Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2003; 180(4): 1111 - 1116. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Grampp, C. Henk, Y. Lu, C. Krestan, H. Resch, F. Kainberger, S. Youssefzadeh, F. Vorbeck, and H. Imhof Quantitative US of the Calcaneus: Cutoff Levels for the Distinction of Healthy and Osteoporotic Individuals Radiology, August 1, 2001; 220(2): 400 - 405. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. R. Krestan, S. Grampp, A. Resch-Holeczke, C. B. Henk, H. Imhof, and H. Resch Diagnostic Disagreement of Imaging Quantitative Sonography of the Calcaneus with Dual X-Ray Absorptiometry of the Spine and Femur Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2001; 177(1): 213 - 216. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. S. Lauderdale, T. Salant, K. L. Han, and P. L. Tran Life-Course Predictors of Ultrasonic Heel Measurement in a Cross-sectional Study of Immigrant Women from Southeast Asia Am. J. Epidemiol., March 15, 2001; 153(6): 581 - 586. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]