| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
The British Journal of Radiology, Vol 70, Issue 835 685-690, Copyright © 1997 by British Institute of Radiology
ARTICLES |
WT Yang, M Suen, A Ahuja and C Metreweli
Department of Diagnostic Radiology & Organ Imaging, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, New Territories, Hong Kong.
84 patients with 89 primary breast cancers underwent high resolution ultrasound, mammography and histological evaluation. Pathological specimens and hard copy images of both imaging modalities were reviewed in order to document the amount of microcalcification present in each tumour. A total of 44, 40 and 46 tumours had visible microcalcification using high resolution ultrasound, mammography and histology, respectively. Using mammography as the gold standard, ultrasound achieved a sensitivity of 95%, specificity of 87.8% and accuracy of 91% in the detection of microcalcification. Histology had a sensitivity of 80%, specificity of 71.4% and accuracy of 75.3%. We conclude that ultrasound is sensitive in the detection of microcalcification in breast cancer when they are within a mass lesion, and is a reliable diagnostic sign of carcinoma when present.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
H. J. Shin, H. H. Kim, S. M. Kim, G. Y. Kwon, G. Gong, and O. K. Cho Screening-Detected and Symptomatic Ductal Carcinoma in Situ: Differences in the Sonographic and Pathologic Features Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2008; 190(2): 516 - 525. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. K. Kang, G. S. Jeon, H. Yim, and Y. S. Jung Diagnosis of the Intraductal Component of Invasive Breast Cancer: Assessment With Mammography and Sonography J. Ultrasound Med., November 1, 2007; 26(11): 1587 - 1600. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. H. Youk, E.-K. Kim, M. J. Kim, J. Y. Lee, and K. K. Oh Missed Breast Cancers at US-guided Core Needle Biopsy: How to Reduce Them RadioGraphics, January 1, 2007; 27(1): 79 - 94. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. T. Yang and G. M. K. Tse Sonographic, Mammographic, and Histopathologic Correlation of Symptomatic Ductal Carcinoma In Situ Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2004; 182(1): 101 - 110. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S-C Chen, Y-C Cheung, Y-F Lo, M-F Chen, T-L Hwang, C-H Su, and S Hsueh Sonographic differentiation of invasive and intraductal carcinomas of the breast Br. J. Radiol., September 1, 2003; 76(909): 600 - 604. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. S. Soo, J. A. Baker, and E. L. Rosen Sonographic Detection and Sonographically Guided Biopsy of Breast Microcalcifications Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2003; 180(4): 941 - 948. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. S. Soo, J. A. Baker, E. L. Rosen, and T. T. Vo Sonographically Guided Biopsy of Suspicious Microcalcifications of the Breast: A Pilot Study Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2002; 178(4): 1007 - 1015. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. K. Moon, J.-G. Im, Y. H. Koh, D.-Y. Noh, and I. A. Park US of Mammographically Detected Clustered Microcalcifications Radiology, December 1, 2000; 217(3): 849 - 854. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| BJR | DMFR | IMAGING | ALL BIR JOURNALS |