BJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Williams, J. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Williams, J. R.

The British Journal of Radiology, Vol 70, Issue 833 498-503, Copyright © 1997 by British Institute of Radiology


ARTICLES

The interdependence of staff and patient doses in interventional radiology

JR Williams
Department of Medical Physics and Medical Engineering, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK.

Staff doses arising from the use of X-rays are principally due to scattered radiation. This is related to the dose received by the patient expressed as the dose-area product (DAP). Doses to patients in interventional radiology are generally higher than for other fluoroscopically guided procedures. Doses to interventional radiologists are, therefore, amongst the highest associated with the use of diagnostic X-rays. The results of staff dose monitoring normalized to DAP should provide an indicator of those procedures which are associated with particularly high radiation exposures to staff, and should help to identify those radiologists whose practice may result in unnecessarily high doses to themselves. A study has been made of patient doses in two X-ray rooms used for interventional procedures associated with vascular and liver diseases. Doses to radiologists in these rooms were normalized to DAP. It was found that the average doses to the body, neck and hands were 0.05, 0.89 and 2.45 microSv/(Gy cm2), respectively for those radiologists with no significant involvement in hepatobiliary procedures. Higher doses were found for one radiologist whose workload included biliary drainage. The whole body dose was 0.17 microSv/(Gy cm2) or 5.8 mSv per year. It was shown that the doses to the neck and hands for the biliary drainage work was 6.59 and 29.0 microSv/(Gy cm2), respectively. This study has demonstrated the value of DAP as a measure of radiologist workload in respect of its significance in terms of staff dose.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Radiat Prot DosimetryHome page
C. J. Martin
A REVIEW OF RADIOLOGY STAFF DOSES AND DOSE MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
Radiat Prot Dosimetry, September 16, 2009; (2009) ncp168v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Radiat Prot DosimetryHome page
G. Kuipers and X. L. Velders
Effective dose to staff from interventional procedures: estimations from single and double dosimetry
Radiat Prot Dosimetry, September 1, 2009; 136(2): 95 - 100.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Radiat Prot DosimetryHome page
O. O. Lie, G. U. Paulsen, and T. Wohni
ASSESSMENT OF EFFECTIVE DOSE AND DOSE TO THE LENS OF THE EYE FOR THE INTERVENTIONAL CARDIOLOGIST
Radiat Prot Dosimetry, December 4, 2008; (2008) ncn296v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
F. A. Mettler Jr, W. Huda, T. T. Yoshizumi, and M. Mahesh
Effective Doses in Radiology and Diagnostic Nuclear Medicine: A Catalog
Radiology, July 1, 2008; 248(1): 254 - 263.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Radiat Prot DosimetryHome page
F. Bleeser, M.-T. Hoornaert, K. Smans, L. Struelens, N. Buls, D. Berus, P. Clerinx, L. Hambach, F. Malchair, and H. Bosmans
Diagnostic reference levels in angiography and interventional radiology: a Belgian multi-centre study
Radiat Prot Dosimetry, March 1, 2008; 129(1-3): 50 - 55.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Radiat Prot DosimetryHome page
C. Foti, R. Padovani, A. Trianni, C. Bokou, S. Christofides, R.H. Corbett, K. Kepler, Z. Korenova, A. Kosunen, J. Malone, et al.
Staff dosimetry in interventional cardiology: survey on methods and level of exposure
Radiat Prot Dosimetry, March 1, 2008; 129(1-3): 100 - 103.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Radiat Prot DosimetryHome page
E. Papageorgiou, V. Tsapaki, I. A. Tsalafoutas, E. Maurikou, S. Kottou, A. Orfanos, G. Karidas, T. Fidanis, E. Zafiriadou, and V. Neofotistou
Comparison of patient doses in interventional radiology procedures performed in two large hospitals in Greece
Radiat Prot Dosimetry, August 17, 2007; (2007) ncm136v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
T Siiskonen, M Tapiovaara, A Kosunen, M Lehtinen, and E Vartiainen
Monte Carlo simulations of occupational radiation doses in interventional radiology
Br. J. Radiol., June 1, 2007; 80(954): 460 - 468.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
B. A. Schueler, T. J. Vrieze, H. Bjarnason, and A. W. Stanson
An Investigation of Operator Exposure in Interventional Radiology
RadioGraphics, September 1, 2006; 26(5): 1533 - 1541.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
K.F. Layton, D.F. Kallmes, H.J. Cloft, B.A. Schueler, and G.M. Sturchio
Radiation exposure to the primary operator during endovascular surgical neuroradiology procedures.
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., April 1, 2006; 27(4): 742 - 743.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Radiat Prot DosimetryHome page
D. Bor, S. Cekirge, T. Turkay, O. Turan, M. Gulay, E. Onal, and B. Cil
Patient and staff doses in interventional neuroradiology
Radiat Prot Dosimetry, December 1, 2005; 117(1-3): 62 - 68.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Radiat Prot DosimetryHome page
H. Goni, I. A. Tsalafoutas, G. Tzortzis, P. Pappas, N. Bouzas, J. Loulakas, A. Georgiou, E. Georgiou, and E. N. Yakoumakis
Radiation doses to patients from digital subtraction angiography
Radiat Prot Dosimetry, December 1, 2005; 117(1-3): 251 - 255.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Radiat Prot DosimetryHome page
A. Trianni, R. Padovani, C. Foti, E. Cragnolini, G. Chizzola, H. Toh, G. Bernardi, and A. Proclemer
Dose to cardiologists in haemodynamic and electrophysiology cardiac interventional procedures
Radiat Prot Dosimetry, December 1, 2005; 117(1-3): 111 - 115.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
M Whitby and C J Martin
A study of the distribution of dose across the hands of interventional radiologists and cardiologists
Br. J. Radiol., March 1, 2005; 78(927): 219 - 229.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
D Bor, T Sancak, T Olgar, Y Elcim, A Adanali, U Sanlidilek, and S Akyar
Comparison of effective doses obtained from dose-area product and air kerma measurements in interventional radiology
Br. J. Radiol., April 1, 2004; 77(916): 315 - 322.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
G J Kemerink, M W de Haan, G B C Vasbinder, M J Frantzen, F W Schultz, J Zoetelief, J T. M Jansen, and J M A van Engelshoven
The effect of equipment set up on patient radiation dose in conventional and CT angiography of the renal arteries
Br. J. Radiol., September 1, 2003; 76(909): 625 - 630.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
M Whitby and C J Martin
Radiation doses to the legs of radiologists performing interventional procedures: are they a cause for concern?
Br. J. Radiol., May 1, 2003; 76(905): 321 - 327.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
N Buls, J Pages, F Mana, and M Osteaux
Patient and staff exposure during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography
Br. J. Radiol., May 31, 2002; 75(893): 435 - 443.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
J M C Gallet and M H Reed
Paediatric personnel extremity dose study
Br. J. Radiol., March 1, 2002; 75(891): 249 - 252.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
E Vano, J Goicolea, C Galvan, L Gonzalez, L Meiggs, J I Ten, and C Macaya
Skin radiation injuries in patients following repeated coronary angioplasty procedures
Br. J. Radiol., November 1, 2001; 74(887): 1023 - 1031.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
E K Osei and C J Kotre
Equivalent dose to the fetus from occupational exposure of pregnant staff in diagnostic radiology
Br. J. Radiol., July 1, 2001; 74(883): 629 - 637.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING  ALL BIR JOURNALS 
Copyright © 1997 by the British Institute of Radiology.