BJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Smith, A. N.
Right arrow Articles by Shah, G. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Smith, A. N.
Right arrow Articles by Shah, G. A.

The British Journal of Radiology, Vol 70, Issue 832 372-374, Copyright © 1997 by British Institute of Radiology

ARTICLES

A survey of routine head CT protocols in Australia

AN Smith and GA Shah
Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Newcastle, Australia.

The choice of scanning protocol in CT will affect the dose delivered to the patient. A nationwide survey of CT operators was carried out in Australia in 1994 to determine the variation in routine head CT protocols. Only 29% of respondents used the supraorbitomeatal (SOM) baseline and thus avoided scanning the eyes. At 74% of sites, the routine protocol included scans both before and after injection of contrast. However, the post-contrast protocol differed from that used in the pre-contrast series in a number of cases. Where 5 mm thick slices were used, the mAs was 16% higher than for 10 mm thick slices. Increased awareness of the influence of baseline, slice thickness/spacing and accompanying exposure factors on patient dose may lead to greater standardization of head CT scanning protocols.




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING  ALL BIR JOURNALS 
Copyright © 1997 by the British Institute of Radiology.