The British Journal of Radiology, Vol 70, Issue 832 360-366, Copyright © 1997 by British Institute of Radiology

ARTICLES

Comparing the sensitivities and specificities of two diagnostic procedures performed on the same group of patients

NE Hawass
College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Studies of diagnostic accuracy are the most commonly performed diagnostic tests. These are carried out by using Decision Matrix tables in which sensitivities, specificities, predictive values and other ratios are calculated and compared. Various recoverable pitfalls and limitations of this method have been reported. This study reports additional further limitations of using this method as a statistical analytical tool. Decision protocol and formulae are presented to show how the sensitivities and specificities of tests are compared in order to make a decision. The study also shows how special tables can be constructed for the four results of comparative diagnostic tests (true positive, true negative, false positive and false negative), and cautions against the use of some 2 x 2 contingency tables. The procedures of how to use these special tables and formulae for comparing sensitivity and specificity and deriving confidence intervals for their difference are presented. It is also shown how it is possible to make a single inference from diagnostic test performance which will permit the determination of which test is better.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				N. D. Desai, S. Miwa, D. Kodama, T. Koyama, G. Cohen, M. P. Pelletier, E. A. Cohen, G. T. Christakis, B. S. Goldman, and S. E. Fremes A randomized comparison of intraoperative indocyanine green angiography and transit-time flow measurement to detect technical errors in coronary bypass grafts J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., September 1, 2006; 132(3): 585 - 594. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. Oepkes, P. G. Seaward, F. P.H.A. Vandenbussche, R. Windrim, J. Kingdom, J. Beyene, H. H.H. Kanhai, A. Ohlsson, G. Ryan, and the DIAMOND Study Group Doppler ultrasonography versus amniocentesis to predict fetal anemia. N. Engl. J. Med., July 13, 2006; 355(2): 156 - 164. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. R. Elkins, T. Lane, H. Goldberg, J. Pagliuso, L. A. Garske, E. Hector, L. Marchetto, J. A. Alison, and P. T. P. Bye Effect of airway clearance techniques on the efficacy of the sputum induction procedure Eur. Respir. J., November 1, 2005; 26(5): 904 - 908. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. M. Erturk CT Evaluation of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors Treated with Imatinib Mesylate Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2005; 185(5): 1366 - 1366. [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. Batista, N. A. Courkoutsakis, E. H. Oldfield, K. J. Griffin, M. Keil, N. J. Patronas, and C. A. Stratakis Detection of Adrenocorticotropin-Secreting Pituitary Adenomas by Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Children and Adolescents with Cushing Disease J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., September 1, 2005; 90(9): 5134 - 5140. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Turchin, I. S. Kohane, and M. L. Pendergrass Identification of Patients With Diabetes From the Text of Physician Notes in the Electronic Medical Record Diabetes Care, July 1, 2005; 28(7): 1794 - 1795. [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. DeWitt, B. Devereaux, M. Chriswell, K. McGreevy, T. Howard, T. F. Imperiale, D. Ciaccia, K. A. Lane, D. Maglinte, K. Kopecky, et al. Comparison of Endoscopic Ultrasonography and Multidetector Computed Tomography for Detecting and Staging Pancreatic Cancer Ann Intern Med, November 16, 2004; 141(10): 753 - 763. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]